Abstract:Corporate hypocrisy poses a significant risk to businesses striving for sustainable management. Stakeholders' increasing interest in ESG (environmental, social, and governance) activities and easy access to information makes maintaining authenticity essential. Any firm caught in hypocrisy risks losing stakeholder trust and damaging its legitimacy. Family firms willing to preserve socioemotional wealth are more susceptible to hypocrisy than general firms due to the family's significant influence on decision-making, including CEO (chief executive officer) turnover and legitimacy crises. This study examined the impact of CSIR (corporate social irresponsibility) on sustainability in two South Korean companies and assessed how internal factors (e.g., CEO turnover and succession) and external factors (e.g., market competition and environmental dynamism) influenced them. To this end, we employed a case study as the central methodology and conducted text mining, interviews, and financial analysis through content analysis. Our first finding is that CSIR negatively affects financial and non-financial performance in family firms. Second, family firms must make genuine efforts to restore their legitimacy. As per the moderation effect of CEO succession, the pivotal consideration is appointing an external CEO rather than whether the subsequent CEO is a family member. Beta chose an external CEO who was a family member, while Alpha selected a long-time company insider who was not a family member as the succeeding CEO. Alpha, which designated an internal nonfamily CEO after the CEO succession, demonstrated a financial performance resilience inferior to Beta. Third, firms must communicate promptly with stakeholders in external conditions. With internationalization and digitalization, stakeholders enjoy a greater array of choices, and the evolution of public media has heightened the prominence of CSIR. The diminishing reliance of stakeholders on a particular company, the active articulation of opinions, and enhanced knowledge magnify the impact of a company's CSIR on the sustainability of family firms.

Marital status and the "S" in ESG management

Married CEOs and corporate social responsibility

Effects of CEO Identity on Non-family Managers’ Pay Dispersion in Family Firms: A Social Comparison Perspective

CEO Ability and Corporate Social Responsibility

CEO Communications and ESG Performance: Deciphering the Impact of Corporate Narratives

The Impact of Couple Shareholding on Corporate ESG Rating

More Social, More Socially Responsible? The Impact of CEO Social Media Use on Corporate Social Performance

The Mechanisms of Chief Executive Officer Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Evidence From Chinese-Listed Firms

Do Married Couples Make Better Family Firm Leaders: Evidence from China

The pitfalls of corporate social irresponsibility: Hypocrisy of family firms in South Korea

Does CEO social capital affect corporate ESG performance?

Corporate social responsibility, CEO characteristics, and earnings management: Evidence from China

Corporate executives' incentives and ESG performance

CEO power, board features and ESG performance: An extensive novel moderation analysis

Walking on the gender tightrope: Unlocking ESG potential through CEOs' dynamic capabilities and strategic board composition

Do CEOs with new compound surnames have better ESG performance? Evidence from China

The ESG performance influence mechanism analysis-based on empirical analysis

The Effects of CEO Awards on Corporate Social Responsibility Focus

Does CEO media exposure affect corporate social responsibility?

Star CEOs and ESG performance in China: An integrated view of role identity and role constraints logics

ESG pay and corporate social irresponsibility: Does culture matter?