Abstract:ABSTRACTFew studies have focused on the effect of individual anthropometrics when considering "set" position posture during the sprint start. This study aimed to measure the effect of different anthropometry-driven block settings on kinetic and kinematic parameters and performance during the start in well-trained and non-trained sprinters. Front block-starting line (FB/SL) distance was manipulated between 50% and 70% of each individual's leg length at 5% intervals, whilst the inter-block distance was held constant at 45% of leg length. Thirty-six sprinters performed three maximal-effort 10 m sprints in each of the five conditions. Joint angles in the "set" position were quantified though 2D video analysis, the forces generated during block clearance phase were measured by dynamometric starting blocks, and times to 5 and 10 m were measured with photocells. The effects of the five block setting conditions were largely consistent irrespective of ability level. Shorter FB/SL distances were associated with significantly more flexed hip and knee angles in the "set" position, a significantly more plantar flexed front ankle, and a significantly more dorsiflexed rear ankle. There were no significant effects of FB/SL distance on total block time, and thus the greater rear block peak forces and impulses produced from the shorter FB/SL distances combined with no effects on the resultant front block peak forces and impulses, led to higher levels of sprint start performance from the shorter FB/SL distances. Considering FB/SL distances closer to 50% of leg length may be beneficial for coaches and athletes to explore during sprint start training.HighlightsThe effects of different front-block starting line distances on "set" position kinematics, block clearance kinetics and sprint start performance are largely consistent irrespective of ability level.When using a medium inter-block distance (45% of leg length), shorter front block-starting line distances (down to 50% of the leg length) led to improved sprint start performance.From shorter front block-starting line distances, sprint start performance was primarily improved through greater force production against the rear block which led to greater impulses due to no change in push durations or resultant front foot forces.Lower-limb length is an important consideration when adjusting anteroposterior block distances.

Track and field starting blocks performance: assessment of an alternative measurement system for evaluating upper limbs contribution

Biomechanical Performance Factors in the Track and Field Sprint Start: A Systematic Review

The Biomechanics of the Track and Field Sprint Start: A Narrative Review

Understanding the track and field sprint start through a functional analysis of the external force features which contribute to higher levels of block phase performance

Effect of different anthropometry-driven block settings on sprint start performance

Comparative Study of the Sprint Start Biomechanics of Men’s 100 M Athletes of Different Levels

A simple method for measuring power, force, velocity properties, and mechanical effectiveness in sprint running

Determinant biomechanical variables for each sprint phase performance in track and field: A systematic review

Effect of postural changes on 3D joint angular velocity during starting block phase

Validity of an Inertial Measurement Unit System to Measure Lower Limb Kinematics at Point of Contact during Incremental High-Speed Running

Experimental Validation of an Upper Limb Benchmarking Framework in Healthy and Post-Stroke Individuals: A Pilot Study

Biomechanical indices represented on radar chart for assessment of performance and infringements in elite race-walkers

Relationships between kinematic characteristics and ratio of forces during initial sprint acceleration

Wheelchair Propulsion Biomechanics in Junior Basketball Players: A Method for the Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Specific Training Program

Gender-Related Differences in Mechanics of the Sprint Start and Sprint Acceleration of Top National-Level Sprinters

Accuracy and Interpretation of the Acceleration from an Inertial Measurement Unit When Applied to the Sprint Performance of Track and Field Athletes

Wearable System Applications in Performance Analysis of RaceRunning Athletes with Disabilities

Comparative analysis of upper body kinematics in stroke, Parkinson's disease, and healthy subjects: An observational study using IMU-based targeted box and block test

Sensor-Based Quantitative Assessment of Children's Fine Motor Competence: An Instrumented Version of the Placing Bricks Test

Center of mass velocity comparison using a whole body magnetic inertial measurement unit system and force platforms in well trained sprinters in straight-line and curve sprinting