Editorial: Volcanoes' change of mood and their impact: effusive—explosive eruptions and vice versa
Hugo Delgado Granados,Donald B. Dingwell,Silvana Hidalgo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1485511
IF: 2.9
2024-10-18
Frontiers in Earth Science
Abstract:Editorial: Volcanoes' change of mood and their impact: effusive - explosive eruptions and vice versaHugo Delgado Granados1,2,*, Donald B. Dingwell2, Silvana Hidalgo31 Departamento de Vulcanología, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.2 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany.3 Instituto Geofísico, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito, Ecuador. * Correspondence Hugo Delgado Granados, hdelgado@unam.mxKeywords: Explosive volcanism, effusive volcanism, basaltic eruptions, obsidian, microlite crystals, volcanic geomorphology, magnetic monitoring, lava dome construction-destructionMost volcanoes in subduction settings with magmas ranging in composition from mafic to felsic may change their eruptive regime between effusive and explosive. For instance, volcanoes such as Pinatubo (Philippines), Mount Saint Helens (USA), Guagua Pichincha and Tungurahua (Ecuador) or Popocatépetl (Mexico), routinely change their eruptive regime between effusive and explosive or from explosive to effusive yet the triggers of regime change are not fully understood (Pallister et al., 1992; Dingwell, 1996; Wright et al., 2006; Cashman et al., 2008; Delgado Granados et al., 2008; Wadsworth et al., 2020; Razvan-Gabriel et al., 2021, Samaniego et al., 2011). This leads to considerable uncertainty in the forecasting of eruptive style and magnitude and in the selection of forecasting parameters that enable mitigation of the threat from such volcanoes (Cassidy et al., 2018). This is especially critical when volcanoes have been presenting continuous activity and changes in regime might only be preceded by very smooth or short-term changes in monitored parameters.The mood swings of volcanoes' eruptions comprise various temporal and spatial scales, as volcanoes perform this switching between effusive and explosive events (Cassidy et al., 2018). Such changes can occur on time scales of months, years, decades, or even centuries. In the short term, during eruption, volcanoes can also switch between effusive and explosive behavior on time scales ranging from fractions of a second to hours or days (Ruprecht and Bachmann, 2010; Venzke, 2013). For large stratovolcanoes, effusive volcanism can occur in one part of the volcanic edifice, while it can behave explosively in another sector (Smith and Houghton, 1995). Even in monogenetic volcanic fields, volcanoes can behave effusively, explosively or exhibit a combination of both, through a central conduit or from fissures controlled by the stress field prevalent in the region.It is important to review the processes that lead to explosive and effusive eruptions of magmas of different compositions (Sparks, et al., 1977; Pallister et al., 1992; Williamson, et al., 2010). These processes can occur in silicic magmas, as well as in magmas of andesitic or basaltic composition (Newhall and Melson, 1983; Cashman and Sparks, 2013; Cassidy et al., 2015), as was observed in the recent eruption of Cumbre Vieja, on the island of La Palma, Spain (Romero et al., 2022; Benito et al., 2023; Birnbaum et al., 2023; Tadeuchi et al., 2023).The role of parameters such as magma viscosity (Lavallée et al., 2007), abundance and loss of magmatic volatiles (Newhall and Melson, 1983; Jaupart and Allègre, 1991; Parmigiani et al., 2016; Preece et al., 2016; Campion et al., 2018), the geometry of the conduits (de Michieli Vitturi et al., 2008), the basement conditions and groundwater (Collinson and Neuberg, 2012; Ball et al., 2015) have all been brought into consideration. Variations in magma supply from depth (in terms of mass and chemical fluxes) may also influence the ascent rate (Scandone and Malone, 1985; Scandone et al., 2007; Preece et al., 2016), crystallization (Nishimura et al., 2005; Wallace et al., 2015), decompression (Alidibirov and Dingwell, 1996; Tarasewicz et al., 2012) and degassing of magma (Edmonds, 2008; Takeuchi et al., 2009; Owen et al., 2013) yielding temporal and spatial variations in eruptive style.The collection of contributions gathered in this special edition of Frontiers demonstrates that more studies are needed to understand the causes of mood changes at volcanoes. Basaltic (e.g. Ikenaga et al.) as well as silicic systems (Aubin et al.) require new ways to envisage the acting processes driving the changes in behavior (Martin Del Pozzo and Santos Morales). All methodologies are useful to elucidate these changes, and the morphological analyses are key for volumetric estimates combined with thermal information (Vallejo et al.). Ikenaga et al. observe that most studies of explosive volcanism concern silicic magmatic systems. Yet explosive basaltic volcanism such as the eruption of Etna in 122 BC (Coltelli et al., 1998), the 1886 eruption of Tarawera (Walker et al., 1984), or the eruption of Parícutin volcano in 1943-1952 (Pioli et al., 2008) demonstrate the importa -Abstract Truncated-
geosciences, multidisciplinary