Clinico-demographic profile and visual outcomes of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy in a multi-tier eyecare network in India

Anthony Vipin Das,Soujanya Kaup,Sujata Das
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_323_24
2024-09-19
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Abstract:Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study is to present the clinico-demographic characteristics of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK), its visual outcomes, factors associated with the choice of treatment, and poor visual outcomes of PBK. Methods: In this hospital-based retrospective study, electronic medical records data of new patients who presented to a multi-tier ophthalmology hospital network in India (November 2010–June 2022) were extracted. Patients with at least 4 weeks of follow-up were analyzed for visual outcome data. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine the factors associated with the treatment choice and poor visual outcomes. Results: Of the 3,323,247 electronic records (with an average follow-up of 293 days) examined, 10,522 eyes of 10,158 patients (0.3%) had PBK. The majority were managed non-surgically ( n = 7372; 70.1%), with increased odds of poor visual outcome by 3.46 times (AdjOR: 3.04–3.92, P < 0.001). Those belonging to the non-paying category had higher odds of poor visual outcome (AdjOR: 1.48, 95%CI: 1.29–1.69; P < 0.001). Surgical management improved vision by 0.72 logMAR (95%CI: 0.60–0.73; P < 0.001). A total of 41.2% ( n = 113/274) of cases that underwent Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty and 18.4% ( n = 285/1551) of Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty attained last follow-up visual acuity (LVA) of 6/18 or better. Conclusion: About three in every thousand patients had PBK. Surgical interventions improved visual acuity significantly. About four in ten patients who underwent DMEK attained a vision of 6/18 or better at the last follow-up visit. Markers of lower socioeconomic strata were independently associated with poor visual outcomes.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?