Predictive Value of MRI Geometric Parameters to the Surgical Complexity of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Stricture
Lujie Song,Zeyu Wang,Guoping Song,Yunfeng Xiao,Jiong Zhang,Qiang Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33064-0
IF: 7.6
2020-01-01
The Journal of Urology
Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologyImaging/Radiology: Uroradiology II (MP42)1 Apr 2020MP42-06 PREDICTIVE VALUE OF MRI GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS TO THE SURGICAL COMPLEXITY OF PELVIC FRACTURE URETHRAL STRICTURE Lujie Song*, Zeyu Wang, Guoping Song, Yunfeng Xiao, Jiong Zhang, and Qiang Fu Lujie Song*Lujie Song* More articles by this author , Zeyu WangZeyu Wang More articles by this author , Guoping SongGuoping Song More articles by this author , Yunfeng XiaoYunfeng Xiao More articles by this author , Jiong ZhangJiong Zhang More articles by this author , and Qiang FuQiang Fu More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000891.06AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of MRI in the preoperative diagnosis and prediction of surgical complexity of the patients with posterior urethral stricture caused by pelvic fracture. METHODS: Urethral MRI images of 43 male patients with pelvic fracture urethral stricture (partial patients complicated by rectal injury) from January 2016 to December 2018 were analyzed. We measured and calculated the geometric parameters such as the gap distance (GD) between two urethral stumps, the pubourethral vertical distance (PUVD) which was defined as the vertical distance from the inferior margin of pubis to the line connecting two urethral broken ends, and the rectourethral median distance (RUMD) which was defined as the length from the anterior wall of the rectum to the middle of line connecting two urethral stumps. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the operative approach (simple perineal approach or inferior pubiotomy). Univariate analysis, multivariate logistic regression analysis and ROC curve analysis were done. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients, 18 underwent inferior pubectomy and 17 underwent simple perineal approach. The numbers of patients with and without rectal injury were 17 and 26, respectively. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the inferior pubectomy group. Univariate analysis showed significant differences in injury time, GD, PUVD, and proximal pubourethral horizontal angles. And multivariate logistic analysis revealed that GD and PUVD were independent predictors of surgical complexity. These two paraments showed the prediction accuracy of 83.7% and 74.4% respectively in the ROC curve analysis. In addition, the RUMD was significantly smaller than that of the patients without rectal injury (13.80mm, 17.81mm). CONCLUSIONS: Although conventional anterograde and retrograde urethrography is the golden standard for the diagnosis of pelvic fracture urethral stricture, MRI can show the anatomical relationship between the urethral stumps and the inferior margin of the pubis, and it is not affected by the incomplete filling of posterior urethra, which has important reference value for the prediction of the surgical approach. Furthermore, in patients with rectal injury, the posterior tissue of the urethra is often weaker and should be carefully handled during the surgery. Source of Funding: / © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e605-e605 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Lujie Song* More articles by this author Zeyu Wang More articles by this author Guoping Song More articles by this author Yunfeng Xiao More articles by this author Jiong Zhang More articles by this author Qiang Fu More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...