Mechanism and Origins of Enantioselectivity in the Rh(I)-Catalyzed Pauson–Khand Reaction: Comparison of Bidentate and Monodentate Chiral Ligands

Lauren C. Burrows,Luke T. Jesikiewicz,Peng Liu,Kay M. Brummond

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03774

IF: 12.9

2020-12-18

ACS Catalysis

Abstract:The narrow substrate scope of the asymmetric Pauson–Khand reaction (PKR) presently limits its synthetic utility. We recently reported an example of an enantioselective PKR with a precursor not comprising a 1,6-enyne by using a cationic Rh(I) catalyst and a chiral monodentate phosphorous ligand. Herein, the mechanisms and ligand effects on the reactivity and selectivity of enyne PKRs using Rh(I) metal complexes with three different ligands ((<i>R</i>)-BINAP, (<i>S</i>)-MonoPhos, or CO) are examined experimentally and computationally. A correlation between experiments and DFT calculations is demonstrated. The PKR with the bidentate ligand (<i>R</i>)-BINAP is fast and shows a low calculated Gibbs free energy of activation (Δ<i>G</i>^‡) for the oxidative cyclization step; the monodentate ligand, (<i>S</i>)-MonoPhos, affords a much slower reaction with a higher Δ<i>G</i>^‡; and using the CO-only Rh complex, the reaction is very slow with a high Δ<i>G</i>^‡. A linear relationship between the enantiomeric excess of (<i>S</i>)-MonoPhos and the PKR product suggests that the active Rh catalyst involves a single ligand. The absolute configuration of the product afforded by each of these ligand-bound catalysts is determined by DFT calculations and confirmed by vibrational circular dichroism spectroscopy. Transition-state structures for the oxidative cyclization step show that the chiral induction is controlled by steric interactions between the phenyl groups of the (<i>R</i>)-BINAP ligand or the methyl groups of the (<i>S</i>)-MonoPhos ligand and an alkenyl hydrogen of the enyne. DFT calculations revealed two competing oxidative cyclization pathways involving either four- or five-coordinated Rh(I) species. The preferred mechanism and the enantioselectivity are affected by the ligand, the substrate, and CO concentration. Incorporating experimental temperature and CO concentration into the Gibbs free-energy calculations proved crucial for obtaining agreement with experimental results.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acscatal.0c03774?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.0c03774</a>.Detailed experimental procedures for the synthesis of enyne <b>1</b>, PKRs affording racemic and enantioenriched <b>2</b>, assignment of absolute configuration of (+)-<b>2</b> and (−)-<b>2</b> by VCD, determination of PKR reaction rates, and testing for nonlinear effects between (<i>S</i>)-<b>L2</b> ee (%) and (<i>S</i>)-<b>2</b> ee (%) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acscatal.0c03774/suppl_file/cs0c03774_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)Computational details and Cartesian coordinates of optimized geometries (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acscatal.0c03774/suppl_file/cs0c03774_si_002.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

chemistry, physical