Conformational polymorphs of the homoleptic scorpionate sandwich complex [(Tp Ph,Me ) 2 Ni], Tp Ph,Me = hydrotris(3-phenyl-5-methylpyrazol-1-yl)borate: ligand substituent effects include intramolecular non-covalent interactions.

Ahmed M. Aboelenen,Javad Shokraiyan,Simeon Sunday Pama,Jeffrey L. Petersen,Michael P. Jensen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2024.123075
IF: 2.345
2024-02-28
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
Abstract:The homoleptic scorpionate sandwich complex [(Tp Ph,Me ) 2 Ni] ( 1 ), where Tp Ph,Me = hydrotris(3-phenyl-5-methylpyrazol-1-yl)borate, crystallizes as a mixture of two polymorphs. A major monoclinic fraction crystallizes as well-formed parallelepipeds and a minor triclinic fraction forms irregularly shaped, anhedral crystals. These exhibit distinct melting points (288 and 294°C, respectively) were observed by differential scanning calorimetry. We obtained X-ray crystal structures of both polymorphs at 100 K. The complex adopts different conformations between the two lattices. These are supported by distinctive ensembles of intramolecular non-covalent interactions, specifically π-stacking and perpendicular C–H•••π contacts between opposing 3-phenylpyrazolyl arms on the co-ligands. The conformation found in the major monoclinic polymorph consists of a counter-rotation of the ligands that reduces the ideal complex symmetry from D 3d to D 3 and results in three-fold pair-wise association of 3-phenylpyrazolyl arms. In contrast, an alternate conformation of 1 in the minor triclinic polymorph consists of two triads, with an ideal complex symmetry of C 2h . Also affected are the tetragonality of the ligand fields and interligand N–Ni–N′ bond angles. A review of sandwich complex structures [(Tp R ) 2 M], where R is an aromatic substituent, shows these conformations are adopted broadly. Hence, substituent effects in second-generation scorpionate ligands are not merely steric in origin.
chemistry, inorganic & nuclear, organic
What problem does this paper attempt to address?