Abstract:Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods are playing an increasingly important role in the pricing of complex financial derivatives. For models in which the prices of the underlying assets are driven by Brownian motions, the performance of QMC methods is known to depend crucially on the construction of Brownian motions. This paper focuses on the impact of various constructions. Although the Brownian bridge (BB) construction often yields very good results, as Papageorgiou pointed out, there are financial derivatives for which the BB construction performs badly [Papageorgiou, A. 2002. The Brownian bridge does not offer a consistent advantage in quasi-Monte Carlo integration. J. Complexity18(1) 171--186]. In this paper we first extend Papageorgiou's analysis to establish an equivalence principle: if the BB construction (or any other construction) is the preferred construction for a particular financial derivative, then for any other construction, there is another financial derivative for which the latter construction is the preferred one. In this sense, all methods of construction are equivalent and no method is consistently superior to others; it all depends on the particular financial derivative. We then show how to find a good construction for a particular class of financial derivatives. In practice, our strategy is to find a good construction for an “easy” problem and then apply it to more complicated problems related to the easy one. This strategy is applied to the arithmetic Asian options (including Bermudan Asian options) based on the weighted average of the stock prices. We do this by studying a simpler problem, namely, the geometric Asian option, for which the best construction is easily available, and applying it to the arithmetic Asian option. Numerical experiments confirm the success of this strategy: whereas in QMC all the common methods (the standard method, BB, and principal component analysis) may lose their power in some situations, the new method behaves very well in all cases. Further large variance reduction can be achieved in combination with a control variate. The new method can be interpreted as a practical way of reducing the effective dimension for some class of functions.

15 years of Adjoint Algorithmic Differentiation (AAD) in finance

Mini-symposium on automatic differentiation and its applications in the financial industry

Stochastic automatic differentiation for Monte Carlo processes

The Discrete Adjoint Method: Efficient Derivatives for Functions of Discrete Sequences

Automatic Differentiable Monte Carlo: Theory and Application

Chebyshev Greeks: Smoothing Gamma without Bias

On improving the efficiency of ADER methods

Fast Greeks by Simulation: the Block Adjoint Method with Memory Reduction

AbstractDifferentiation.jl: Backend-Agnostic Differentiable Programming in Julia

A fast Monte Carlo scheme for additive processes and option pricing

Enhancing Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods by Exploiting Additive Approximation for Problems in Finance

Improved adaptive Multilevel Monte Carlo and applications to finance

Exact retrospective Monte Carlo computation of arithmetic average Asian options

Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering: An Equivalence Principle and Dimension Reduction

Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey

Non-Linear pricing with differential machine learning

Efficient Computation of Option Prices and Greeks by Quasi-Monte Carlo Method with Smoothing and Dimension Reduction.

A Comparison of Automatic Differentiation and Continuous Sensitivity Analysis for Derivatives of Differential Equation Solutions

Numerical approximations of McKean Anticipative Backward Stochastic Differential Equations arising in Initial Margin requirements

An Integrated Quasi-Monte Carlo Method for Handling High Dimensional Problems with Discontinuities in Financial Engineering