Cognitive and affective perspective taking amongst adolescent offenders with variants of callous–unemotional traits

Stavroola A. S. Anderson,David J. Hawes,Pamela C. Snow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-023-02356-9

2024-01-13

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract:Evidence suggests that associations between antisocial behaviour, callous–unemotional (CU) traits and cognitive empathy (e.g. perspective taking) vary depending on more fine-grained dimensions of these constructs. This study examined associations between adolescent antisocial behaviour and individual differences in cognitive and affective perspective taking ability. Based on current theory regarding distinct variants of CU traits, we further tested whether the correlates of CU traits differed amongst youth with high versus low levels of anxiety. Participants were 130 male adolescents (81 youth offenders; 49 non-offenders) aged 13–20 years, of predominantly Caucasian and Aboriginal Australian ethnicity. Perspective taking skills were indexed using performance-based testing, and self-report data was collected on CU traits and anxiety in a cross-sectional design. Offender status was associated with poorer cognitive and affective perspective taking. In addition, associations between CU traits and perspective taking skills were moderated by anxiety. Specifically, CU traits were associated with poorer skills for second-order cognitive perspective taking amongst high-anxiety youth, whereas CU traits were associated with better cognitive and affective perspective taking skills amongst low-anxiety youth. More fine-grained assessment of such factors stands to enhance understanding of, and effective intervention for, antisocial youth.

pediatrics,psychiatry,psychology, developmental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper explores the cognitive and affective empathy abilities of adolescents with different levels of callous-unemotional (CU) traits among juvenile offenders. The study found that the association between antisocial behavior and cognitive and affective empathy abilities varies depending on the level of CU traits and anxiety. Specifically, in highly anxious adolescents, CU traits are associated with poorer cognitive empathy at the second level, while in low-anxiety adolescents, CU traits are related to better cognitive (including both first and second levels) and affective empathy abilities.

The research analyzed data from experimental tests and self-report measures of 130 male adolescents aged 13 to 20, including 81 juvenile offenders and 49 non-offenders, focusing primarily on cognitive empathy (such as theory of mind and perspective-taking in contextual cues) and affective empathy. The results indicated that juvenile offenders have weaker abilities in cognitive and affective empathy, and the relationship between CU traits and empathy skills is influenced by anxiety levels.

The paper highlights the importance of a more detailed assessment of these factors to enhance understanding of antisocial adolescents and develop effective intervention measures. The study also suggests that for adolescents with different variations of CU traits, their empathy deficits may vary, providing a basis for personalized intervention.