Abstract:Current approaches to biodiversity conservation are largely based on geographic areas, ecosystems, ecological communities, and species, with less attention on genetic diversity and the evolutionary continuum from populations to species. Conservation management generally rests on discrete categories, such as identified species, and, for threated taxa, intraspecific units. Species, in particular, provide a common measure of biodiversity yet in both theory and nature, speciation is typically a protracted process progressing from connected populations to unambiguous species with variable rates of phenotypic, ecological and genetic divergence. Thus, most recognized species are not genetically uniform and are sometimes highly structured into historically isolated populations worthy of consideration as intraspecific units that represent unique genetic diversity for conservation. Genome screens offer unprecedented resolution of structure across taxonomic boundaries in species complexes, and have the potential to oversplit species if not interpreted conservatively. This highlights the blurred line between populations and species, and can confound simple dichotomies of “species” vs. “not species.” At the same time, like plants, there is increasing evidence that even distantly related animal species can hybridize and exchange genes. A review of conservation legislation reveals that legal definitions of “species” are quite flexible and can accommodate a range of infra-specifictaxa and divergent populations, as well as taxonomically recognized species. For example, the legislative definition of a species around the world can include: species, subspecies, varieties, and geographically and/or genetically distinct populations. In principle, this flexibility allows for protection of genetic diversity and maintenance of evolutionary processes at a broad range of infra-specific levels. However, evolutionary biologists often fail to adequately justify and then translate their evidence for genetically defined units into categories suited to assessment under local legislation. We recommend that (i) genomic data should be interpreted conservatively when formally naming species, (ii) concomitantly, there should be stronger impetus and a more uniform approach to identifying clearly justified intraspecific units, (iii) guidelines be developed for recognizing and labeling intraspecific data that align with best scientific practice, and (iv) that the more nuanced view of species and speciation emerging from genomic analyses is communicated more effectively by scientists to decision makers.

Population genomics as a new tool for wildlife management

Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management

Population Genomics for the Management of Wild Vertebrate Populations

How Can Genomics Help or Hinder Wildlife Conservation?

Whole Genomes Inform Genetic Rescue Strategy for Montane Red Foxes in North America

Applying Population Viability Analysis to Inform Genetic Rescue That Preserves Locally Unique Genetic Variation in a Critically Endangered Mammal

Leveraging genomic load estimates to optimize captive breeding programmes

Evaluation of the Impact of Population Management on the Genetic Parameters of Selected Spiral-Horned Antelopes

The integration of whole‐genome resequencing and ecological niche modelling to conserve profiles of local adaptation

New developments in the field of genomic technologies and their relevance to conservation management

How admixed captive breeding populations could be rescued using local ancestry information

Conservation genomics: disequilibrium mapping of domestic cattle chromosomal segments in North American bison populations

Genetic rescue often leads to higher fitness as a result of increased heterozygosity across animal taxa

An inbreeding perspective on the effectiveness of wildlife population defragmentation measures – a case study on wild boar (Sus scrofa) of Veluwe, The Netherlands

Genome-Wide and Trait-Specific Markers: A Perspective in Designing Conservation Programs

Habitat remediation followed by managed connectivity reduces unwanted changes in evolutionary trajectory of high extirpation risk populations

Genetic tools in the management of invasive mammals: recent trends and future perspectives

A decision-making framework to maximise the evolutionary potential of populations - Genetic and genomic insights from the common midwife toad ( Alytes obstetricans ) at its range limits

Multi-generational benefits of genetic rescue

Genomics‐informed captive breeding can reduce inbreeding depression and the genetic load in zoo populations

Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing With the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics