Anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy as curative-intent treatment in dMMR/MSI-H rectal cancer: A multicentre cohort study

Qiao-Xuan Wang,Bin-Yi Xiao,Yong Cheng,Ai-Wen Wu,Tao Zhang,Hui Wang,Xuan Zhang,Wei-Xin Huang,Jing-Hua Tang,Wu Jiang,Smitha Krishnamurthi,Yuan Li,Jian Cai,Ling-Heng Kong,Dan-Dan Li,Zhi-Zhong Pan,Xiao-Shi Zhang,Pei-Rong Ding,Scott R. Steele
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.016
IF: 10.002
2022-10-01
European Journal of Cancer
Abstract:BackgroundIn a portion of patients with DNA mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) rectal cancer, clinical complete response (cCR) could be achieved after anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) immunotherapy. However, no data are available concerning the safety of omitting surgery and adopting immunotherapy as a curative-intent treatment for these patients.MethodsWe retrospectively collected a series of patients with dMMR/MSI-H rectal adenocarcinoma who had cCR after receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and adopted immunotherapy as curative-intent treatment from six institutions. Survival outcomes were analysed using the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsNineteen patients were included with a median age of 48 (range 19–63). One patient was diagnosed with stage I disease, four with stage II disease and fourteen with stage III disease. Sixteen patients received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy as the first line of therapy, and eleven patients were treated with single-agent anti-PD-1 antibodies. The median time from the start of treatment to cCR was 3.8 (range 0.7–6.5) months. During a median follow-up of 17.1 (range 3.1–33.5) months since achieving cCR, no local or distant relapse was observed. Two-year local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease free-survival and overall survival for the whole cohort were 100%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively.ConclusionsFor patients with dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced rectal cancer who achieved cCR during anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, adopting immunotherapy as curative-intent treatment might be an alternative option. Longer follow-up and larger cohorts are warranted to verify this innovative treatment approach.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?