Non‐isothermal Thermogravimetric Analysis of Peltophorum pterocarpum and Evaluation of Kinetic Triplet

Narra Thejaswini,P. K. R. Annapureddy,Nanda Kishore
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202300487
IF: 2.2148
2024-05-31
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Abstract:Kinetic triplet, that is, reaction kinetics, thermodynamics, and reaction mechanisms of non‐isothermal pyrolysis of Peltophorum pterocarpum stems, has been reported. Mean activation energy by five models was found to be 183–194 kJ mol−1. The difference between Ex and ∆H was ≈5–6 kJ mol−1 for any given conversion. Criado's master plot revealed multistep reaction pathways for different conversion levels and heating rates. The primary focus of the twenty‐first century has been on developing new and cleaner fuels from renewable sources. The increasing availability of renewable energy sources in environment, such as lignocellulosic biomass derived from agricultural and forest residues, has created a plethora of opportunities for biofuel production. For this purpose, the search for appropriate waste biomass source and the design of suitable reactors are very essential, where the latter requires the knowledge of kinetic triplets. These requirements paved the way to the novelty of the present work as a selection of a rarely used biomass source, that is, Peltophorum pterocarpum, and its non‐isothermal thermogravimetric analysis for the evaluation of kinetic triplet of the process. The range of temperature is 298–1173 K attained at heating rates of 10–55 K min−1. Kinetics were estimated using differential Friedman method (DFM), distributed activation energy method (DAEM), Ozawa–Flynn–Wall (OFW), Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS), and Starink (STK) models. Mean activation energy (kJ mol−1) and pre‐exponential factor (min−1) of pyrolysis process by five models were 183.68 and 1.24 × 1017 for DAEM, 194.28 and 3.08 × 1021 for DFM, 183.68 and 4.40 × 1016 for KAS, 184.12 and 2.12 × 1014 for OFW, and 183.93 and 3.56 × 1016 for STK. Average values of changes in Gibbs free energy, enthalpy, and entropy by five models are 174 kJ mol−1, 178 kJ mol−1, and 0.007 kJ mol−1 K−1, respectively. Criado's master plots revealed distinct reaction pathways during the process for different conversion levels.
engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?