Abstract:Importance: People in the US face high out-of-pocket medical expenses, yielding financial strain and debt. Objective: To understand how households respond to medical bills they disagree with or cannot afford. Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective cohort study was carried out using a survey fielded between August 14 and October 14, 2023. The study included a random sample of adult (aged ≥18 years) survey respondents from the Understanding America Study (UAS). Participant responses were weighted to be nationally representative. The analysis took place from November 3, 2023, through January 8, 2024. Main outcomes and measures: Respondents reported if their household received a medical bill that they could not afford or did not agree with in the prior 12 months, and if anyone contacted the billing office regarding their concerns. Those who did reach out were asked about their experience and those who did not were asked why. Results: The survey was sent to 1233 UAS panelists, of which 1135 completed the survey, a 92.1% cooperation rate. Overall, 1 in 5 of the 1135 respondents received a medical bill that they disagreed with or could not afford. Leading bill sources were physician offices (66 [34.6%]), emergency room or urgent care (22 [19.9%]), and hospitals (31 [15.3%]), and 136 respondents (61.5%) contacted the billing office to address their concern. A more extroverted and less agreeable personality increased likelihood of reaching out. Respondents without a college degree, lower financial literacy, and the uninsured were less likely to contact a billing office. Among those who did not reach out, 55 (86.1%) reported that they did not think it would make a difference. Of those who reached out, 37 (25.7%) achieved bill corrections, better understanding (16 [18.2%]), payment plans (18 [15.5%]), price drop (17 [15.2%]), financial assistance (10 [8.1%]), and/or bill cancellation (6 [7.3%]), while 32 (21.8%) said that the issue was unresolved and 23.8% reported no change. These outcomes aligned well with respondents' billing concerns with financial relief for 75.8% of respondents reaching out about an unaffordable bill, bill corrections for 73.7% of those who thought there was mistake, and a price drop for 61.8% of those who negotiated. Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of patients in the US found that most respondents who self-advocated achieved bill corrections and payment relief. Differences in self-advocacy may be exacerbating socioeconomic inequalities in medical debt burden, as those with less education, lower financial literacy, and the uninsured were less likely to self-advocate. Policies that streamline the administrative burden or shift it from patients to the billing clinician may counter these disparities.

Recipients of Representative Payeeship with Mental Illness: Financial Leverage, Conflict, and Satisfaction

Relationship Quality Among Persons with Serious Mental Illness and Their Relatives: Rates and Correlates

Reciprocal relations between financial hardship, sense of societal belonging and mental health for social assistance recipients

Fintech for Psychological and Financial Resilience: Determinants of Financial Data Sharing Behavior for Individuals with Bipolar Disorder

A collaboration between adult protective services and forensic accounting examiners to investigate complex financial exploitation: formative evaluation findings

Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Conduct a Collaborative Needs Assessment of Mental Health Service Users: Identifying Research Questions and Building Academic-Community Trust

Financial dissatisfaction in people with psychotic disorders - A short report on its prevalence and correlates in a large naturalistic psychosis cohort

Assessing Mental Healthcare Worker Experiences of Workplace Fairness and Organizational Value: A National Survey of Peer-Support Specialists

“Being There” vs “Being Direct:” Perspectives of Persons with Serious Mental Illness on Receiving Support with Physical Health from Peer and Non-Peer Providers

Supportive Fintech for Individuals with Bipolar Disorder: Financial Data Sharing Preferences to Support Longitudinal Care Management

Disparate Patient Advocacy When Facing Unaffordable and Problematic Medical Bills

Influences on the perception of elder financial abuse among older adults in Southern California

Financial Hardship, Hope, and Life Satisfaction Among Un/Underemployed Individuals With Psychiatric Diagnoses: A Mediation Analysis

Staff working with people who have intellectual disabilities within secure hospitals: expressed emotion and its relationship to burnout, stress and coping

Mental Health Care Providers’ Views of Their Work with Consumers and Their Reports of Recovery-Orientation, Job Satisfaction, and Personal Growth

Representative compensation and disability claimant outcomes

Frailty and Perceived Financial Exploitation: Findings from the Finance, Cognition, and Health in Elders Study

Whom Do I Trust to Represent Me? Long-Term Care Resident and Family Perspectives on Legitimate Representation

Consumer Empowerment and Self-Advocacy Outcomes in a Randomized Study of Peer-Led Education

Validation of the Psychological Empowerment Scale and Client-Centered Care Questionnaire in budget holders with disabilities

Systematic Review of Financial Interventions for Adults Experiencing Behavioral Health Conditions