Magnetic resonance imaging tumor response score (mrTRS) predicts therapeutic effect and prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A prospective, multi-center study

Zhen Guan,Rui-Jia Sun,Wu-Teng Cao,Hong-Mei Zhang,Tao Yu,Xiao-Ping Yu,Jian-Xin Zhang,Xiao-Yan Zhang,Xiao-Ting Li,Zhi-Yang Zhou,Xin-Ming Zhao,Lu Wen,Ying-Shi Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.08.028
IF: 6.901
2020-10-01
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background and purpose</h3><p>The MRI-assessed tumor regression grade (mrTRG) is limited due to its subjectivity and poor consistency on pathological tumor regression grade (pTRG). A new MRI criterion was established to predict the prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Materials and methods</h3><p>The new MRI criterion magnetic resonance imaging tumor response score (mrTRS) was based on the retrospective sample of 214 LARC patients (unpublished data). Subsequently, 878 LARC patients were enrolled for a prospective, multicenter study. Baseline and postoperative MRI were obtained, and imaging features were measured by collecting the pathological, clinical and follow-up data. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank estimate and multivariate cox regression model was used to determine the prognosis of mrTRS in LARC patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). The predictive capability of 3-year prognosis between mrTRS and mrTRG was determined by time-dependent ROC curves.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The results demonstrated that mrTRS acted as an independent predictor of survival outcomes. mrTRS stratified by good and moderate responders showed significantly lower risk of death (HR=0.04, 95%CI 0.01-0.31; HR=0.35, 95%CI 0.23-0.52), distant metastasis (HR=0.25, 95%CI 0.13-0.52; HR=0.42, 95%CI 0.30-0.58), and local recurrence when compared with poor responders(HR=0.01 95%CI 0.23-0.52;HR=0.38, 95%CI 0.16-0.90). In contrast, no significant difference was observed among mrTRG stratified groups. Excellent and substantial interobserver agreement for mrTRS and mrTRG evaluation was observed (κ=0.92 and 0.62), respectively.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>mrTRS can serve as an effective predictor for assessing tumor regression grade in LARC patients with NACRT.</p>
oncology,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?