Abstract:PURPOSE: Over the past decade, it has been debated whether retaining bindings in working memory (WM) requires more attention than retaining constituent features, focusing on domain-general attention and space-based attention. Recently we proposed that retaining bindings in WM needs more object-based attention than retaining constituent features (Gao et al., 2017; Shen, Huang, & Gao, 2015). However, the composed features in the tested bindings all belong to separable feature dimensions. It has been suggested that there are two types of feature relations: Separable features (e.g., color and shape in a colored shape) and integral features (e.g., width and height of a rectangle). While our brain encodes separable features independently, it is difficult to encode the integral features separately. Consequently, the object-based attention hypothesis of retaining bindings in WM may be constrained to separable features, and retaining bindings of integral features does not require more object-based attention than the constitute single features. METHODS: In the current study we addressed this issue by requiring the participants to memorize both width and height of three rectangles or the binding between the two feature dimensions. In the critical condition, we added a secondary transparent motion task during the delay interval of the change-detection task, such that the secondary task competed for object-based attention with the to-be-memorized stimuli. If more object-based attention is required for retaining bindings than for retaining constituent features, the secondary task should impair the binding performance to a larger degree relative to the performance of constituent features. RESULTS: In contrast to the prediction of object-based attention hypothesis, the added secondary task equally impaired the performance of single features and binding. CONCLUSION: Retaining bindings of integral features in WM does not require more object-based attention than the constitute single features, providing a key constraint to the object-based attention hypothesis.

Some young adults hyper-bind too: Attentional control relates to individual differences in hyper-binding

Hyper-Binding: Older Adults Form Too Many Associations, Not Too Few

Hyper-binding: the surprising roles of age and affect

The Effect of Emotional Distraction on Hyper-Binding in Young and Older Adults.

Using Attribute Amnesia to Test the Limits of Hyper-Binding and Associative Deficits in Working Memory.

The Influence of Working Memory Load of Binding on Selective Attention

Bindings in Working Memory: the Role of Object-Based Attention

Paying attention to binding: Further studies assessing the role of reduced attentional resources in the associative deficit of older adults

The Role of Attention in Retaining the Binding of Integral Features in Working Memory.

Associative memory in older adults: Making sense of associative memory deficits and hyperbinding effects.

Retaining Quantitative-dimension Binding in Working Memory: A Passive Process

Separating binding and retrieval of event files in older adults

Object-based attention in retaining binding in working memory: Influence of activation states of working memory

Retaining Bindings of Integral Features in Working Memory: the Role of Object-based Attention

A dual mechanisms of control account of age differences in working memory.

The neural correlates of age effects on verbal-spatial binding in working memory

Does the Presence of More Features in a Bound Representation in Working Memory Require Extra Object-Based Attention?

More Attention with Less Working Memory: the Active Inhibition of Attended but Outdated Information

Unraveling the Binding Problem in Working Memory: Insights from the Hierarchical Binding Model

Object-Based Attention Underlies the Rehearsal of Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory

Feature Binding in Working Memory Requires Object-based Attention.