Abstract:We analyze the four-body B→ϕ(→KK¯)K*(→Kπ) decays in the perturbative QCD approach, where the invariant mass of the KK¯ (Kπ) system is limited in a window of ±15 MeV (±150 MeV) around the nominal ϕ(K*(892)) mass. In addition to the dominant P-wave resonances, two important S-wave backgrounds in the selected invariant mass region are also accounted for. Angular momentum conservation allows six helicity amplitudes to contribute, including three P waves, two single S waves, and one double S wave, in the decays under study. We calculated the branching ratio for each component and found sizable S-wave contributions, which coincide roughly with the experimental observation. The obtained branching ratios of B0(+)→ϕK*0(+) are comparable with the previous theoretical predictions and support the experimental measurements, whereas the predicted B(Bs0→ϕK¯*0) is an order of magnitude smaller than the current world average in its central value. The longitudinal polarizations are predicted to be around 0.7, consistent with previous PQCD results but larger than the world average values. Aside from the direct CP asymmetries, the true and fake triple product asymmetries, originating from the interference between the perpendicular polarization amplitude and other helicity amplitudes, are also calculated in this work. In the special case of the neutral modes, both the direct CP asymmetries and true triple product asymmetries are expected to be zero due to the vanishing weak phase difference. The direct CP asymmetries for the B+ mode are predicted to be tiny, of order 10-2, since the tree contributions are suppressed strongly with respect to the penguin ones. The true triple product asymmetries have shown no significant deviations from zero. In contrast, large fake asymmetries are observed in these decays, indicating the presence of significant final-state interactions. We give the theoretical predictions of the S-wave induced triple product asymmetries for the first time, which is consistent with current LHCb data and would be checked with future measurements from Belle and BABAR experiments if the S-wave components can be properly taken into account in the angular analysis.

S -wave contributions to the B ( s ) → χ c 1 ( π π , K π , K K ) decays

Resonant contributions to three-body B ( s ) → [ D ( * ) , D ̄ ( * ) ] K + K − decays in the perturbative QCD approach

C P -violating observables in four-body B → φ ( → K K ̄ ) K * ( → K π ) decays

Role of D ( s ) * and their contributions in B ( s ) → D ( s ) h h ′ decays

$B\to K\bar K(πη)h$ decays in the presence of isovector scalar resonances $a_0(980,1450)$

Quasi-two-body decays $B_c \to K^{*} h \to K πh $ in the perturbative QCD

Scalar resonance contributions in the $D_{s1}(2460)^{+} \rightarrow D_{s}^{+}π^{+}π^{-}$ reaction

Contributions of $K_0^(1430)$ and $K_0^(1950)$ in the charmed three-body $B$ meson decays

Study of D s + → K + K − π + decay

$S$-wave resonance contributions to the $B^0_{(s)}\to η_c{(2S)}π^+π^-$ in the perturbative QCD factorization approach

Study of decays in the perturbative QCD approach

Branching Fractions and Direct CP Asymmetries of $\bar B_s ^0 \to K^0 h^+h^{\prime -}(h^{(\prime)}=K,π)$ Decays

The scalar <i>f</i><sub>0</sub>(500), <i>f</i><sub>0</sub>(980), and <i>a</i><sub>0</sub>(980) resonances and vector mesons in the single Cabibbo-suppressed decays <sub>c</sub> <i>pK</i><SUP>+</SUP><i>K</i><SUP>-</SUP> and <i>p</i><SUP>+</SUP><SUP>-</SUP>

Establishing Low-Lying Doubly Charmed Baryons

The a0(980) and f0(980) in the process D s + → K + K − π +

Quasi-two-body decays in perturbative QCD

${\bf B_s\to K^{(*)} \ell\bar ν}$, Angular Analysis, S-wave Contributions and ${\bf |V_{ub}|}$

Exploiting the Symmetries of P and S wave for B --> K^* mu^+ mu^-

Contributions of the subprocess in the charmless three-body meson decays

Contributions of the subprocess $K^*_0(1430) \to Kη^{\prime}$ in the charmless three-body $B$ meson decays

Study of B^{0}_{s} \rightarrow \ TT(a_{2}(1320),K^{*}_{2}(1430),f_{2}(1270),f^{'}_{2}(1525)) in the perturbative QCD approach