Outcomes of da Vinci® versus Hugo RAS® radical prostatectomy: focus on postoperative course, pathological findings, and patients' health-related quality of life after 100 consecutive cases (the COMPAR-P prospective trial)
Alessandro Antonelli,Alessandro Veccia,Sarah Malandra,Riccardo Rizzetto,Francesco Artoni,Piero Fracasso,Francesca Fumanelli,Iolanda Palumbo,Antonio Raiti,Luca Roggero,Lorenzo P Treccani,Vincenzo Vetro,Vincenzo DE Marco,Antonio B Porcaro,Maria A Cerruto,Matteo Brunelli,Riccardo Bertolo,Residency Program in Urology at the University of Verona,Alberto Baielli,Claudio Brancelli,Sonia Costantino,Lorenzo DE Bon,Francesco Ditonno,Andrea Franceschini,Peres F Pongmoni,Francesca Montanaro,Greta Pettenuzzo,Endri Toska
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05928-7
Abstract:Background: This study aims to prospectively compare the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed using the Hugo RAS and da Vinci Xi systems, focusing on the postoperative course, pathological findings, and health-related quality of life. Methods: The COMPAR-P trial, a prospective post-market study (clinical-trials.org NCT05766163), commenced in March 2023, enrolling patients for RARP performed with either da Vinci or Hugo RAS without selection criteria for up to 50 consecutive cases per system. Two experienced console surgeons performed the procedures according to a standardized technique. The study evaluated differences between da Vinci and Hugo RAS regarding the postoperative course, pathology findings, 30-day PSA value, functional metrics, and health-related quality of life using SF-36 and University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index questionnaires. Results: Fifty patients underwent DV-RARP and H-RARP each. Postoperative complications, pathological data, and quality of life metrics did not significantly differ between the groups. Noteworthy limitations include the comparison between the first 50 H-RARP and last 50 DV-RARP cases, as well as the potential influence of surgeons' specialized expertise on the generalizability of findings. Conclusions: This prospective study of 100 unselected patients undergoing RARP with either da Vinci or Hugo RAS systems reveals comparable outcomes in postoperative course, pathology, functional metrics, and health-related quality of life. However, further research with larger sample sizes, longer follow-up periods, and diverse surgical expertise is essential to validate these findings and better understand the implications for clinical practice.