Abstract:Background: Mesh hernia repair is widely accepted because of the associated reduction in hernia recurrence compared with suture-based repair. Despite initiatives to reduce risk, mesh infection and mesh removal are a significant challenge. In an era of healthcare value, it is essential to understand the global cost of care, including the incidence and cost of complications. The purpose of this study was to identify the outcomes and costs of care of patients who required the removal of infected hernia mesh. Methods: A review of databases from 2006 through June 2018 identified patients who underwent both ventral hernia repair (VHR) and re-operation for infected mesh removal. Patient demographic and operative details for both procedures, including age, Body Mass Index, mesh type, amount of time between procedures, and information regarding interval procedures were obtained. Clinical outcome measures were the length of the hospital stay, hospital re-admission, incision/non-incision complications, and re-operation. Hospital cost data were obtained from the cost accounting system and were combined with the clinical data for a cost and clinical representation of the cases. Results: Thirty-four patients underwent both VHR and removal of infected mesh material over the 12-year time frame and were included in the analyses; the average age at VHR was 48 years, and 16 patients (47%) were female. Following VHR, 21 patients (62%) experienced incision complications within 90 days post-operatively, the complications ranging from superficial surgical site infection (SSI) to evisceration. A mean of 22.65 months passed between procedures. After mesh removal, 16 patients (47%) experienced further incisional complications; and 22 (65%) patients had at least one re-admission. Eighteen patients (53%) required a minimum of one additional related operative procedure after mesh removal. Median hospital costs nearly doubled (p < 0.001) for the mesh removal ($23,841 [interquartile range {IQR} $13,596-$42,148]) compared with the VHR admission ($13,394 [IQR $8,424-$22,161]) not accounting for re-admission costs. A majority experienced hernia recurrence subsequent to mesh removal. Conclusions: Mesh infection after hernia repair is associated with significant morbidity and costs. Hospital re-admission, re-operations, and recurrences are common among these patients, resulting in greater healthcare resource utilization. Development of strategies to prevent mesh infection, identify patients most likely to experience infectious complications, and define best practices for the care of patients with mesh infection are needed.

Mesh-associated complications in minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy: a systematic review

Could robotic‐assisted surgery reduce mesh‐related complications after ventral mesh rectopexy? Experience of a tertiary centre and systematic review of the literature

Laparoendoscopic extraperitoneal surgical techniques for ventral hernias and diastasis recti repair: a systematic review

Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse

Prophylactic Mesh-related Reoperations and Mesh-related Problems During Subsequent Relaparotomies: Long-term Results From the PRIMA Trial

Are Surgeons Going to Be Left Holding the Bag? Incisional Hernia Repair and Intra-Peritoneal Non-Absorbable Mesh Implant Complications

Prophylactic Mesh Placement in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Laparotomy: A Systematic Review

Proficiency gain curve and predictors of outcome for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy

Costs and Complications Associated with Infected Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair

Quality of Life, Functional Outcomes, and Recurrence After Resection Rectopexy Versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse Repair

The Preliminary Experience in Laparoscopic Abdominal Ventral Incisional Hernia Repair with Meshes

Reoperations for mesh-related complications after pelvic organ prolapse repair: 8-year experience at a tertiary referral center

Host–biomaterial interactions in mesh complications after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery

Ventral mesh rectopexy for recurrent rectal prolapse after Altemeier perineal proctosigmoidectomy: feasibility and outcomes

Evaluation and Management of Complications after Transvaginal Mesh Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of ventral hernia: biologic versus synthetic mesh

Long-term mesh-related complications from minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh for small to medium-sized ventral hernias

Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors

From Meshes to Minimally Invasive Techniques: A Comprehensive Review of Modern Hernia Repair Approaches

Clinical effects of prosthetic mesh in the treatment of incarcerated groin hernias

Transvaginal mesh: a historical review and update of the current state of affairs in the United States