Abstract:There is evidence that patients are generally satisfied with virtual care. 1 -3 However, little is known about logistical or interpersonal components of the patient experience that are associated with the commonly used summary measure of "likelihood to recommend." Our primary objective was to characterize whether patient-reported experience varied between virtual and in-person visits with respect to 3 domains of experience: (1) clinician listening carefully, (2) clinician explaining things clearly, and (3) clinician treating patient with courtesy and respect. We then examined the association between these domains of patient experience with overall patient experience rating after accounting for visit, patient, and physician characteristics. This cross-sectional study was a retrospective analysis of administrative data from Mass General Brigham, a large regional health care system, including all ambulatory visits from October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021, with patient experience scores recorded. The study was approved by the Mass General Brigham institutional review board, and informed was waived for this retrospective use of data. We followed the STROBE reporting guideline. We compared experiences between virtual (video or audio-only) and in-person encounters for each experience domain and their contribution to overall likelihood of recommending the physician to friends or family. We used generalized linear mixed models to characterize the association between visit modality and physician and patient characteristics that were associated with each of the 3 experience domains, accounting for clustering by physician. The final model examined the contribution of these domains to the overall likelihood to recommend the physician, after accounting for physician and patient characteristics, ease of scheduling, and clustering by physician. Analyses were conducted in RStudio version 4.1.2 (R Project for Statistical Computing), and hypothesis testing was 2-sided and P < .05 indicated statistical significance. Additional methodological details appear in the eAppendix in Supplement 1. Of 417 828 included encounters with 3462 physicians during the study period, 327 158 (78%) were in-person, 74 926 (18%) video, and 14 744 (4%) audio-only; 60% of encounters were among female patients, and the mean (SD) patient age was 62.3 (18.0) years. Encounters with patient experience data were less often audio-only and were made by patients who were slightly older and less often Hispanic, preferring another language, or with Medicaid insurance. Patient race, ethnicity, language preference, and portal activation also varied by encounter type (Table 1). Overall, 378 824 encounters (91%) received a top-box score for overall likelihood to recommend the physician. Patient experience varied between in-person, video, and audio-only visits and was notably lower for audio-only on all domains measured. When modeling all 3 domains (listened carefully, explained things, and treated with courtesy and respect), both video and audio-only visits had lower odds of a "yes, definitely" response after adjustment for patient and physician characteristics. Factors such as belonging to a minoritized racial or ethnic group, preferring a language other than English, having Medicaid for insurance, and lack of patient portal activation were all associated with lower odds of a "yes, definitely" response (Table 2). When examining factors associated with overall likelihood to recommend a physician, the strongest association was with communication skills (Table 2). Audio-only visits had lower likelihood to recommend the physician overall (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.87); however, this was entirely explained by patient experience domains (adjusted OR including patient experience, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.25-2.23). The association remained similar with addition of patient and physician characteristics to the model (fully adjusted OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.14-2.17) (Table 2). We found that 2 components of the patient experience had the strongest association with patients' overall indication of their likelihood to recommend a physician: when patients reported that clinicians listen carefully and that they explain things well. While patient experience ratings were similar for in-person and video visits, they were lowest for audio-only visits, likely due to challenges with effective patient-physician communication during these encounters. Data were from a single academic integrated delivery network and may not be generalizable to other settings. In addition, our health system only sends surveys and collects data from successfully completed visits; thus, our results may be impacted by selection bias if visits that failed to occur at all due to technical issues were not included. Given the well-described disparities in patients selected for or choosing audio-only visits, 3 - -Abstract Truncated-

Analysis of missed clinic visits, preferred languages, and telemedicine in a pediatric gastroenterology practice

Analyzing Linguistic Disparities in Telehealth Care Outcomes at a Multidisciplinary Craniofacial Center

1057 A Tale of Two Languages: Evaluating Caregiver Satisfaction with Telemedicine in a Pediatric Sleep Medicine Clinic

Language Disparities in Caregiver Satisfaction with Physician Communication at Well Visits from 0-2 Years

Utilization Gaps During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Telemedicine Uptake in Federally Qualified Health Center Clinics

Patient interest in and barriers to telemedicine video visits in a multilingual urban safety-net system

Telemedicine Disparities in Ambulatory Cardiology Visits in a Large Academic Health System

Improving Attendance and Patient Experiences During the Expansion of a Telehealth-Based Pediatric Otolaryngology Practice

Telemedicine visits requiring follow-up in-person visits at an urban academic family medicine centre

"Complete and Accurate, and Warmhearted Too": Telemedicine Experiences and Care Needs of Mandarin-Speaking Patients with Limited English Proficiency

Language-Specific Challenges and Solutions for Equitable Telemedicine Implementation in the Primary Care Safety Net During COVID-19

Patient Characteristics Associated With Telemedicine Access for Primary and Specialty Ambulatory Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Patients’ Satisfaction with and Preference for Telehealth Visits

Patient Characteristics Associated With Choosing a Telemedicine Visit vs Office Visit With the Same Primary Care Clinicians

Social determinants of choosing telemedicine for contraceptive care: a retrospective cohort study

Primary care telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: patient’s choice of video versus telephone visit

Prenatal Care Clinician Preferences Among Patients With Spanish-Preferred Language

Critical Domains Within the Self-Reported Patient Experience of Virtual Care

Abstract C058: The Impact of Preferred Language on Cancer WellBeing Screen Outcomes and Supportive Care Program Touch Points

Impact of Telemedicine Versus In-Person Pediatric Outpatient Type 1 Diabetes Visits on Immediate Glycemic Control: Retrospective Chart Review

Telehealth Potential in Pediatric Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Care is Comparable to In-Person Care But Disparities Remain