Abstract:Background: Current clinical practice is to remove a colorectal polyp detected during colonoscopy and determine whether it is an adenoma or hyperplastic by histopathology. Identifying adenomas is important because they may eventually become cancerous if untreated, whereas hyperplastic polyps do not usually develop into cancer, and a surveillance interval is set based on the number and size of adenomas found. Virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) (an electronic endoscopic imaging technique) could be used by the endoscopist under strictly controlled conditions for real-time optical diagnosis of diminutive (≤ 5 mm) colorectal polyps to replace histopathological diagnosis. Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the VCE technologies narrow-band imaging (NBI), flexible spectral imaging colour enhancement (FICE) and i-scan for the characterisation and management of diminutive (≤ 5 mm) colorectal polyps using high-definition (HD) systems without magnification. Design: Systematic review and economic analysis. Participants: People undergoing colonoscopy for screening or surveillance or to investigate symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer. Interventions: NBI, FICE and i-scan. Main outcome measures: Diagnostic accuracy, recommended surveillance intervals, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adverse effects, incidence of colorectal cancer, mortality and cost-effectiveness of VCE compared with histopathology. Data sources: Electronic bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched for published English-language studies from inception to June 2016. Bibliographies of related papers, systematic reviews and company information were screened and experts were contacted to identify additional evidence. Review methods: Systematic reviews of test accuracy and economic evaluations were undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Meta-analyses were conducted, where possible, to inform the independent economic model. A cost-utility decision-analytic model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of VCE compared with histopathology. The model used a decision tree for patients undergoing endoscopy, combined with estimates of long-term outcomes (e.g. incidence of colorectal cancer and subsequent morbidity and mortality) derived from University of Sheffield School of Health and Related Research's bowel cancer screening model. The model took a NHS perspective, with costs and benefits discounted at 3.5% over a lifetime horizon. There were limitations in the data on the distribution of adenomas across risk categories and recurrence rates post polypectomy. Results: Thirty test accuracy studies were included: 24 for NBI, five for i-scan and three for FICE (two studies assessed two interventions). Polyp assessments made with high confidence were associated with higher sensitivity and endoscopists experienced in VCE achieved better results than those without experience. Two economic evaluations were included. NBI, i-scan and FICE are cost-saving strategies compared with histopathology and the number of quality-adjusted life-years gained was similar for histopathology and VCE. The correct surveillance interval would be given to 95% of patients with NBI, 94% of patients with FICE and 97% of patients with i-scan. Limitations: Limited evidence was available for i-scan and FICE and there was heterogeneity among the NBI studies. There is a lack of data on longer-term health outcomes of patients undergoing VCE for assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps. Conclusions: VCE technologies, using HD systems without magnification, could potentially be used for the real-time assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps, if endoscopists have adequate experience and training. Future work: Future research priorities include head-to-head randomised controlled trials of all three VCE technologies; more research on the diagnostic accuracy of FICE and i-scan (when used without magnification); further studies evaluating the impact of endoscopist experience and training on outcomes; studies measuring adverse effects, HRQoL and anxiety; and longitudinal data on colorectal cancer incidence, HRQoL and mortality. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016037767. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Cost effectiveness of esophageal varices screening strategies of cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension

Screening of esophageal varices in children using esophageal capsule endoscopy: a multicenter prospective study

Esophageal Variceal Ligation Monotherapy Versus Combined Ligation and Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Esophageal Varices.

PP64 Economic Evaluation for Esophageal Cancer Screening in China

Comparative Cost Effectiveness of Reflux-Based and Reflux-Independent Strategies for Barrett's Esophagus Screening

Modeling the Cost-effectiveness of Esophageal Cancer Screening in China

Evaluation of Noninvasive Tools for Predicting Esophageal Varices in Patients With Cirrhosis at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town

Feasibility of transnasal endoscopy in screening for esophageal and gastric varices in patients with chronic liver disease

Endoscopic Screening Program for Control of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Varied Populations: A Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Cost of Treatment of Oesophageal Variceal Bleeding in Patients with Cirrhosis in France: Results of a French Survey.

Application of detachable string-magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of post-endoscopic treatment of 50 liver cirrhosis patients with esophagogastric varices during follow-up

Higher frequency of gastric neoplasia in advanced chronic liver disease patients: Impact of screening endoscopy in an intermediate-high risk country

Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of a French prospective multicenter trial (EVIEPEB)

Virtual chromoendoscopy for the real-time assessment of colorectal polyps in vivo: a systematic review and economic evaluation

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetically guided capsule endoscopy with a detachable string for detecting oesophagogastric varices in adults with cirrhosis: prospective multicentre study

Is Transient Elastography Needed for Noninvasive Assessment of High-Risk Varices? The REAL Experience

Determining The Cost-Effectiveness Of Endoscopic Surveillance For Gastric Cancer In Patients With Precancerous Lesions

High-resolution microendoscopy for esophageal cancer screening in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Varices and Portal Collateral Venous Abnormalities by Endosonography in Cirrhotic Patients

Evaluation of non-invasive marker of esophageal varices in cirrhosis of liver

Νon-invasive screening for esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis