Abstract:The premise in experiments with repeated measures is that observations taken in the same experimental unit are correlated and that correlations decrease proportionally to the increase in the distance between measurements in time or space. Nevertheless, these experiments are often analyzed as if the correlations between the repeated measures were constant or using methods that only consider correlations different, which may impact on the rejection rate of the null hypothesis, and ultimately type I error rate and statistical power. In this context, this study investigated the application of mixed linear models with different assumptions about the covariance matrix in data sets from simulated experiments with repeated measures. 84 scenarios that varied in terms of the covariance matrix pattern (14 structures), number of repeated measurements (4 and 8) and sample size (4, 8 and 12) were evaluated. 10,000 data sets were simulated for each scenario based on a multivariate normal distribution and were subsequently analyzed using mixed linear models. Type I error rate and statistical power for the hypothesis test of the interaction between treatments and repeated measures were estimated as the proportion of p values less than or equal to 0.01 or 0.05 out of a total of 10,000 tests for each scenario. The models were also evaluated for their ability to fit the data using Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC). Thus, the frequency with which the covariance structures were chosen by the selection criteria was computed. Results indicate that the assumption chosen most frequently by the information criteria resulted from the specified covariance structure that corresponded to the empirical covariance structure of the analyzed data sets, particularly for those with larger number of repeated measures and sample sizes. Results also indicate that the use of covariance models that do not recognize heterogeneous correlations between repeated measures can inflate type I error or reduce it to very conservative levels, which may affect the conclusion of agricultural experiments. For a 5% significance level, type I error bias was greater than 2α, while for 1% significance level, bias was over 5α. In addition, the statistical power was reduced when the assumption about the covariance matrix of the data sets did not correspond to the empirical covariance structure, particularly for those data sets with a smaller sample size.

Addressing the algebraic structure of a linear mixed model with balanced design towards model extension

Linear mixed effects models for non‐Gaussian continuous repeated measurement data

Univariate Autoregressive Structural Equation Models as Mixed-Effects Models

The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. II. Treatment structure and the general analysis of variance

Linear Mixed-Effects Models for Non-Gaussian Repeated Measurement Data

An Introduction to Mixed Models for Experimental Psychology

Algebraic model selection and experimental design in biological data science

Canonical fundamental skew-t linear mixed models

Multivariate Shared-Parameter Mixed-Effects Location Scale Model for Analysis of Intensive Longitudinal Data

Functional Linear Mixed Models for Irregularly or Sparsely Sampled Data

Parametric Models of Covariance Matrices for Repeated Measures: A Simulation Study on Fit, Error and Statistical Power in Mixed Linear Models

Mixed Models and Shrinkage Estimation for Balanced and Unbalanced Designs

An Introduction to Linear Mixed-Effects Modeling in R

Extensions of linear regression models based on set arithmetic for interval data

Scalable Bayesian variable selection and model averaging under block orthogonal design

Extending the code in the open-source saemix package to fit joint models of longitudinal and time-to-event data

Analysis of a longitudinal multilevel experiment using GAMLSSs

Maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear mixed-effects models with crossed random effects by combining first-order conditional linearization and sequential quadratic programming

Model Specification in Mixed-Effects Models: A Focus on Random Effects

Linear mixed models for complex survey data: Implementing and evaluating pairwise likelihood

Evaluation of A Bayesian Approach to Estimating Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Mixture Models