Neurological outcomes and mortality after neonatal seizures with electroencephalographical verification. A systematic review

Hanna Westergren,Mikael Finder,Helena Marell-Hesla,Ronny Wickström
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2024.02.005
IF: 3.692
2024-02-14
European Journal of Paediatric Neurology
Abstract:Aim To conduct a systematic review of post-neonatal neurological outcomes and mortality following neonatal seizures with electroencephalographical verification. Methods The databases Medline, Embase and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies. All abstracts were screened in a blinded fashion between research team members and reports found eligible were obtained and screened in full text by two members each. From studies included, outcome results for post-neonatal epilepsy, cerebral palsy, intellectual disability, developmental delay, mortality during and after the neonatal period and composite outcomes were extracted. A quality assessment of each study was performed. Results In total, 5518 records were screened and 260 read in full text. Subsequently, 31 studies were included, containing cohorts of either mixed or homogenous etiologies. Follow-up time and gestational ages varied between studies. No meta-analysis could be performed due to the low number of studies with comparable outcomes and effect measures. Reported cumulative incidences of outcomes varied greatly between studies. For post-neonatal epilepsy the reported incidence was 5–84%, for cerebral palsy 9–78%, for intellectual disability 24–67%, for developmental delay 10–67% and for mortality 1–62%. Subgroup analysis had more coherent results and in cohorts with status epilepticus a higher incidence of post-neonatal epilepsy from 46 to 84% was shown. Conclusion The large variation of reported incidences for neurological outcomes and mortality found even when restricting to cohorts with electroencephalographically verified neonatal seizures indicates selection bias as a significant confounder in existing studies. Population-based approaches are thus warranted to correctly predict outcomes in this group.
pediatrics,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?