Direct Risk Assessment From Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Explainable Deep Learning
Ananya Singh,Robert J H Miller,Yuka Otaki,Paul Kavanagh,Michael T Hauser,Evangelos Tzolos,Jacek Kwiecinski,Serge Van Kriekinge,Chih-Chun Wei,Tali Sharir,Andrew J Einstein,Mathews B Fish,Terrence D Ruddy,Philipp A Kaufmann,Albert J Sinusas,Edward J Miller,Timothy M Bateman,Sharmila Dorbala,Marcelo Di Carli,Joanna X Liang,Cathleen Huang,Donghee Han,Damini Dey,Daniel S Berman,Piotr J Slomka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.07.017
Abstract:Background: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is frequently used to provide risk stratification, but methods to improve the accuracy of these predictions are needed. Objectives: The authors developed an explainable deep learning (DL) model (HARD MACE [major adverse cardiac events]-DL) for the prediction of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and validated its performance in large internal and external testing groups. Methods: Patients undergoing single-photon emission computed tomography MPI were included, with 20,401 patients in the training and internal testing group (5 sites) and 9,019 in the external testing group (2 different sites). HARD MACE-DL uses myocardial perfusion, motion, thickening, and phase polar maps combined with age, sex, and cardiac volumes. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality or nonfatal MI. Prognostic accuracy was evaluated using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: During internal testing, patients with normal perfusion and elevated HARD MACE-DL risk were at higher risk than patients with abnormal perfusion and low HARD MACE-DL risk (annualized event rate, 2.9% vs 1.2%; P < 0.001). Patients in the highest quartile of HARD MACE-DL score had an annual rate of death or MI (4.8%) 10-fold higher than patients in the lowest quartile (0.48% per year). In external testing, the AUC for HARD MACE-DL (0.73; 95% CI: 0.71-0.75) was higher than a logistic regression model (AUC: 0.70), stress total perfusion deficit (TPD) (AUC: 0.65), and ischemic TPD (AUC: 0.63; all P < 0.01). Calibration, a measure of how well predicted risk matches actual risk, was excellent in both groups (Brier score, 0.079 for internal and 0.070 for external). Conclusions: The DL model predicts death or MI directly from MPI, by estimating patient-level risk with good calibration and improved accuracy compared with traditional quantitative approaches. The model incorporates mechanisms to explain to the physician which image regions contribute to the adverse event prediction.