Academic and Community Hospitals differ in stroke subtype classification and cardiac monitoring: the DiVERT multi-center cohort study

David Z. Rose,Ruchir A. Shah,Josh Snavely,Marla Hairston,Stephen Adams,Paul D. Ziegler,Sarah C. Rosemas,Michael Chandler,Roberto Carta,Karah B. Neisen,Noreli C. Franco,Thomas G. Devlin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1428731
IF: 3.4
2024-12-05
Frontiers in Neurology
Abstract:BackgroundCardiac monitoring strategies to detect occult atrial fibrillation (AF) post-stroke differ among healthcare institutions. This may be related to discrepancies in stroke subtype classification/adjudication, and/or consultation of cardiology specialists at Community Hospitals (CoH) and Academic Centers (AcC). Identifying the degree of heterogeneity may encourage development of guideline-directed monitoring protocols, result in higher AF detection rates and treatments, and fewer strokes.MethodsThe DiVERT (SeconDary Stroke PreVEntion ThRough Pathway ManagemenT) study was designed to characterize post-stroke cardiac monitoring practices in a hospital setting. Care pathways were assessed with in-person stakeholder interviews; patient-level data were reviewed using electronic medical records.ResultsDiVERT identified 2,475 patients with diagnoses of cryptogenic (83.6% vs. 33.1%, p
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?