Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio identifies low‐risk polycythaemia vera patients for early Ropeginterferon alfa‐2b therapy

Tiziano Barbui,Alessandra Carobbio,Paola Guglielmelli,Arianna Ghirardi,Francesca Fenili,Giuseppe Gaetano Loscocco,Valerio De Stefano,Francesco Ramundo,Maria Chiara Finazzi,Alessandro Rambaldi,Alessandro M. Vannucchi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19813
2024-10-09
British Journal of Haematology
Abstract:The effect of Ropeginterferon alfa‐2B (Ropeg) versus phlebotomy alone (Phl‐O) on the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was investigated in 126 patients enrolled in the Low‐PV phase II trial. (A) Patients treated with Ropeg had a 4‐fold increased probability of response (HCT <45% at 12 months), especially if their baseline NLR was higher than 3.5. (B) At baseline, the proportion of patients with NLR ≥3.5 was similar in the two arms of the study. After 12 months of treatment, this proportion was significantly lower in patients treated with Ropeg (31.7% vs. 56.1%, p = 0.008). (C) Change in NLR from baseline was significantly correlated with reduction in JAK2 V617F allele burden and improvement in MPN‐SAF symptom scores, particularly in the Ropeg group with a baseline NLR ≥3.5. Summary We investigated the effect of Ropeginterferon alfa‐2b (Ropeg) versus phlebotomy‐only (Phl‐O) on the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in 126 patients randomized in the low‐polycythaemia vera (PV) phase II trial. Patients with a baseline NLR ≥3.5 vs. <3.5 had a longer history of PV, were more likely to have splenomegaly, higher JAK2V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) (56% vs. 20% p = 0.001) and more proliferative disease. Ropeg was superior to Phl‐O in reducing NLR (p = 0.008), and the reduction was strongly influenced by the reduction in neutrophils and less by a change in lymphocytes (−59% and −14% respectively). This effect was associated with the achievement of the low‐PV primary end‐point (p = 0.021), symptom reduction and reduction in JAK2 VAF. Interestingly, the reduction in JAK2 VAF from baseline was linearly associated with the reduction in NLR. Patients who failed Phl‐O at 12 months had characteristics that distinguished them from responders, including very high NLR and resistance to cross‐over to 100 μg Ropeg every 2 weeks suggesting higher escalated doses of Ropeg. In conclusion, the study provides evidence that NLR can serve as a valuable biomarker to assess and guide treatment with Ropeg in the early stage of low‐risk PV patients.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?