Assessment of alternative fluid calibration to estimate traceable liquefied hydrogen flow measurement uncertainty

Federica Gugole,Menne D. Schakel,Aleksandr Druzhkov,Maarten Brugman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.177

IF: 7.2

2024-06-23

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Abstract:The usage of liquefied hydrogen (LH 2 ) is growing fast as the EU aims to be climate-neutral by 2050. Therefore, reliable and consistent measurements of LH 2 amounts (as determined by flow meters) will become increasingly important for custody transfers. Reliability and consistency of measurements is established from calibration. Due to the lack of facilities being able to calibrate flow meters directly with LH 2 as calibration fluid, the question arises whether the measurement error of the calibration performed on a different fluid and different process conditions are representative for the errors when measuring LH 2 . An on-site calibration of two turbine meters measuring LH 2 flow was performed. A Coriolis mass flow meter calibrated on water was used as a reference in conjunction with a dedicated flow meter model, which was validated by a directly SI-traceable calibration on liquefied natural gas. LH 2 flow rates were within 1000 kg/h and 3000 kg/h, which are relevant to hydrogen transport by LH 2 trailers. The analysis of the measurement data reveal errors on totalized mass ranging from 2.0 % to 2.9 % with a total calibration uncertainty of 1.3 % ( k=2 ), where the main uncertainty source was identified as the on-site density estimate necessary to convert the volume flow measurements into mass flow measurements. The results indicate the need for reliable and accurate temperature measurements (the latter allowing for an accurate density estimate), so that volume based and mass based amount measurements can be compared with smaller uncertainties.

energy & fuels,electrochemistry,chemistry, physical