Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

A generalization bound of deep neural networks for dependent data

A Generalization Bound of Deep Neural Networks for Dependent Data

Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Deep Neural Networks

Generalization Bounds for Dependent Data using Online-to-Batch Conversion

Statistical Properties of Deep Neural Networks with Dependent Data

Understanding the Generalization Ability of Deep Learning Algorithms: A Kernelized Rényi’s Entropy Perspective

Understanding the Generalization Ability of Deep Learning Algorithms: A Kernelized Renyi's Entropy Perspective

On Tighter Generalization Bound for Deep Neural Networks: CNNs, ResNets, and Beyond

Generalization bounds for neural ordinary differential equations and deep residual networks

Deep learning for ψ -weakly dependent processes

Excess risk bound for deep learning under weak dependence

Going Deeper, Generalizing Better: an Information-Theoretic View for Deep Learning.

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

Generalization bounds for learning under graph-dependence: a survey

Over-parameterized Deep Nonparametric Regression for Dependent Data with Its Applications to Reinforcement Learning.

Explaining generalization in deep learning: progress and fundamental limits

Mixture Data for Training Cannot Ensure Out-of-distribution Generalization

Uniform Generalization Bounds on Data-Dependent Hypothesis Sets via PAC-Bayesian Theory on Random Sets

Inconsistency, Instability, and Generalization Gap of Deep Neural Network Training

Generalization in Graph Neural Networks: Improved PAC-Bayesian Bounds on Graph Diffusion