Abstract:Determining how animals allocate energy, and how external factors influence this allocation, is crucial to understand species' life history requirements and response to disturbance. Our manuscript presents a bioenergetic modelling approach to describe the daily energy acquisition and requirements of a marine top predator, based on prey characteristics and foraging data from stomach content and animal‐borne tags, respectively. The model is used to investigate the impact of changing prey structure on the energetics of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus), which consequently can help inform top‐down effects on marine ecosystems, but its basic principles are universal, and it could be parameterized to other marine top predator species. Determining how animals allocate energy, and how external factors influence this allocation, is crucial to understand species' life history requirements and response to disturbance. This response is driven in part by individuals' energy balance, prey characteristics, foraging behaviour and energy required for essential functions. We developed a bioenergetic model to estimate minimum foraging success rate (FSR), that is, the lowest possible prey capture rate for individuals to obtain the minimum energy intake needed to meet daily metabolic requirements, for female sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus). The model was based on whales' theoretical energetic requirements using foraging and prey characteristics from animal‐borne tags and stomach contents, respectively. We used this model to simulate two prey structure change scenarios: (1) decrease in mean prey size, thus lower prey energy content and (2) decrease in prey size variability, reducing the variability in prey energy content. We estimate the whales need minimum of ~14% FSR to meet their energetic requirements, and energy intake is more sensitive to energy content changes than a decrease in energy variability. To estimate vulnerability to prey structure changes, we evaluated the compensation level required to meet bioenergetic demands. Considering a minimum 14% FSR, whales would need to increase energy intake by 21% (5–35%) and 49% (27–67%) to compensate for a 15% and 30% decrease in energy content, respectively. For a 30% and 50% decrease in energy variability, whales would need to increase energy intake by 13% (0–23%) and 24% (10–35%) to meet energetic demands, respectively. Our model demonstrates how foraging and prey characteristics can be used to estimate impact of changing prey structure in top predator energetics, which can help inform bottom‐up effects on marine ecosystems. We showed the importance of considering different FSR in bioenergetics models, as it can have decisive implications on estimates of energy acquired and affect the conclusions about top predator's vulnerability to possible environmental fluctuations.

Modeling coupled dynamics of an empirical predator-prey system to predict top predator recovery

Revealing the extent of sea otter impacts on bivalve prey through multi-trophic monitoring and mechanistic models

Top-predator recovery abates geomorphic decline of a coastal ecosystem

Influence of predation mortality on past and future dynamics of Pacific Herring: implications for stock status and future biomass

Modeling the impacts of a changing and disturbed environment on an endangered beluga whale population

The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion

Data needs for sea otter bioenergetics modeling

Identifying drivers of demographic rates in an at‐risk population of marine mammals using integrated population models

Spatiotemporal and Trade-Off Dynamics in Prey–Predator Model with Domed Functional Response and Fear Effect

Recovery of a marine keystone predator transforms terrestrial predator–prey dynamics

Species distribution modeling of northern sea otters (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) in a data‐limited ecosystem

Bioenergetic modelling of a marine top predator's responses to changes in prey structure

Methods for comparing theoretical models parameterized with field data using biological criteria and Sobol analysis

Dynamical behaviors of autonomous and nonautonomous models of generalist predator–prey system with fear, mutual interference and nonlinear harvesting

Stock Assessment and End-to-end Ecosystem Models Alter Dynamics of Fisheries Data

A statistical population reconstruction model for wildlife populations: A case study with white‐tailed deer and fisher

Integrating predator energetic balance, risk-taking behavior and microhabitat in functional response: Untangling indirect interactions in a multispecies vertebrate community

Modeling Dynamic Interactions and Coherence Between Marine Zooplankton and Fishes Linked to Environmental Variability

A big data-model integration approach for predicting epizootics and population recovery in a keystone species

Bioeconomic analysis of harvesting within a predator-prey system: A case study in the Chesapeake Bay fisheries

Monitoring dynamic spatio-temporal ecological processes optimally