The use of idealised experiments in testing a new convective parametrization: Performance of CoMorph‐A
Sally L. Lavender,Alison J. Stirling,Michael Whitall,Rachel A. Stratton,Chimene L. Daleu,Robert S. Plant,Adrian Lock,Jian‐Feng Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4660
2024-02-03
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Abstract:This study documents and discusses the performance of a new convection scheme, CoMorph‐A, in a range of idealised experiments using the Met Office Unified Model. These experiments range from highly idealised with only high‐resolution convection‐resolving data as "truth" to those based on observational field campaigns with real data and previous intercomparison studies to compare against. Results show what works well in this configuration, and what areas will require further work. Snapshot of surface precipitation rate [mm·hr−1] on day 4 of the 90% tropospheric humidity (EUROCS) case, 1200 x 1200 km2 domain simulations from the (a) 1 km CRM; re‐gridded to same 10 km grid, (b) CTRL and (c) CoMorph‐A. CoMorph is a new mass‐flux convection parametrization under development at the Met Office designed for use within the Unified Model and its successor model, LFRic. Use of a three‐dimensional idealised model enables controlled tests of the performance of the scheme across different regimes. This includes the interaction between the physical parametrizations and the resolved dynamics, allowing study of the emergent organisation of convection on the resolved scale. A selection of well‐known cases is revisited here, with the purpose of documenting the extent to which CoMorph captures a range of important, but challenging, behaviour such as the diurnal cycle and sensitivity to tropospheric moisture. Simulations using CoMorph‐A, a new physics package, that has been demonstrated to perform well at numerical weather prediction (NWP) and climate scales, are compared against the current global atmosphere configuration and high‐resolution results. In addition to an entirely new convection scheme, the package of changes includes significant changes to the cloud, microphysics, and boundary‐layer parametrizations. Recognising that CoMorph‐A is the first version of a scheme that will continue to be substantially developed and to obtain good performance, compromises in tuning have had to be made. These idealised tests therefore show what works well in this configuration, and what areas will require further work. As such, it is quite a demanding testbed and could be viewed as some of the equipment required for a "convective playground".
meteorology & atmospheric sciences