Abstract:Purpose: The main objective of the study was to examine Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its influence on organizational reputation. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its influence on organizational reputation. Preliminary empirical review revealed a strong positive correlation between CSR activities and organizational reputation across industries and geographical contexts. Companies prioritizing CSR initiatives like environmental sustainability and ethical practices are perceived more favorably by stakeholders, underscoring CSR's role in enhancing reputation and trust. Transparent communication of CSR efforts through various channels strengthens this reputation further. Additionally, the study identifies mediating and moderating factors such as CEO characteristics and industry norms, emphasizing the importance of strong leadership and tailored strategies. Ultimately, integrating CSR into strategic decision-making, transparent communication, and adaptation to stakeholder expectations are crucial for building a positive reputation that fosters long-term success. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Stakeholder theory, Institutional theory and the Resource Based View theory may be used to anchor future studies on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The study provided comprehensive recommendations based on its findings. Firstly, it suggests prioritizing CSR initiatives aligned with core values and business objectives to enhance reputation and build stakeholder trust. Secondly, transparent communication strategies should be adopted to convey CSR efforts effectively, fostering credibility and engagement. Furthermore, integrating CSR into overall business strategy and operations ensures its alignment with organizational culture and decision-making processes, maximizing its impact. Investing in stakeholder engagement enhances the effectiveness of CSR initiatives by involving diverse stakeholders in program design and evaluation. Additionally, monitoring and evaluating CSR impact through both quantitative and qualitative metrics is essential for accountability and continuous improvement. Lastly, leadership commitment and organizational culture are emphasized as crucial drivers of CSR, with senior executives playing a pivotal role in fostering an ethical and socially responsible environment that enhances organizational reputation and sustainability.

CSR Strategies in Response to Competitive Pressures

Corporate Social Responsibility Development: An Analysis Based on Consumer-selection

Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility.

Business Strategy and Corporate Social Responsibility

CSR in Stakeholde Expectations: And Their Implication for Company Strategy

Sustainable Strategies: Navigating Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility for Enlightened Self-Interest

Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare Analysis

The role of corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility in shaping corporate reputation: An analysis of competitive action and innovation strategies

Sources of Sustainable Competitive Strategy:An Integrative Theoretical Framework for Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Propositions

Doing bad by doing good? Corporate social responsibility fails when controversy arises

CSR transparency and firm value: Is the connection differential for cost leaders and differentiators?

Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility

The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR

Does Market Competition Dampen Environmental Performance? Evidence from China

Foreign competition and corporate social responsibility: the role of the firm–government relationships

Still Dare to Be Different? Peers' CSR Engagement and Analysts' Response to Focal Firms' CSR Strategies

Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Thailand: The Moderating Effect of Competitive Positioning

Competing for government procurement contracts: The role of corporate social responsibility

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its Influence on Organizational Reputation

Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: The mediating role of marketing competence and the moderating role of market environment