Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT Endoscopic surgeries are gaining popularity for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) as minimal invasive procedures. However, most of the literature focus on the transforaminal endoscopic technique for only herniated lumbar disc pathology. Although unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) decompression has proven to be an effective tool for treating lumbar stenosis, there are rarely any published literature demonstrating the efficacy of UBE technique confined to ASD patients. PURPOSE To assess the clinical and radiological outcome for patients with lumbar adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) presenting with spinal stenosis who received unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) surgery for bilateral decompression. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective study from database of multiple institutions PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 39 ASD patients who received UBE surgery with minimum of 1-year follow-up from 4 different institutions were retrospectively collected for the study. OUTCOME MEASURES MRI parameters for decompression status: cross-sectional area (CSA) of dural sac, the diameters of dural sac X-ray parameters for spinal instability: operated segment's dynamic rotation angle and transition distance Clinical outcome: VAS (visual analog scale), ODI (Oswestry disability index) METHODS From June 2018 to November 2022, a total of 39 ASD patients with minimum of 1 year follow-up were retrospectively collected from 4 different institutions. Baseline demographic and surgery-related data were collected. Postoperative MRI was taken about 2 days after the surgery and compared with baseline for analysis of decompression amount. Lumbar X-rays were taken at baseline, immediate and 1 year postop and analyzed for occurrence of spinal instability. Various clinical surveys were taken at baseline, immediate and 1 year postoperatively, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and events of complications were recorded. RESULTS The MRI parameters showed significant amount of spinal canal decompression: Cross sectional area (CSA) of dural sac (0.55 ± 0.21cm 2 to 1.11 ± 0.41 cm 2 ; p<0.001), AP diameter (6.1 ± 2.0mm to 9.7± 2.9mm, p<0.001) and transverse diameter (10.4 ± 3.4mm to 13.9 ± 2.3mm, p<0.001) of dural sac in axial view, and the AP diameter in sagittal view(5.4 ± 1.8mm to 8.1 ± 2.6mm; p<0.001). The X-ray parameters did not show significant occurrence of instability throughout 1 year period, measured by dynamic rotation angle and transition distance of the operated segment (4.5 ± 3.3° vs 5.8 ± 3.4 ° vs 5.3 ± 4.3 °, p=0.310; 1.7 ± 1.3 mm vs 1.5 ± 1.2mm vs 1.2 ± 1.9mm, p = 0.400). The clinical survey scores showed significant improvement throughout 1 year follow-up: VAS back (6.4 ± 2.4 vs 2.1 ± 1.2 vs 2.4 ± 1.7, p<0.001), VAS leg (7.5 ± 1.5 vs 1. ± 1.6 vs 1.8 ± 1.9, p<0.001, and ODI score (47.5 ± 16.3 vs 19.8 ± 9.7 vs 19.8 ± 5.4, p<0.001). 2 out of 39 patients (5.1%) received revision surgery during the follow-up periods, and 3 out of 39 patients (7.7%) had each complication of hematoma, dura tear, and neurologic deficit. CONCLUSIONS UBE surgery for ASD patients presenting with spinal stenosis can achieve satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcome without inducing mechanical instability. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

P305. Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for adjacent segment degeneration

Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy with Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Approach for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease: Case Report and Technical Note

A Case Report: Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Revision for Adjacent Segmental Disease: Case Presentations and Literature Review

Clinical efficacy of unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion

Decompression via unilateral biportal endoscopy for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A comparative study with decompression via open discectomy

[Clinical study of lumbar stability after unilateral biportal endoscopy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases].

Biportal Versus Uniportal Endoscopic Technique in Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Early clinical and radiological evaluation of unilateral biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective study

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Thoracic Spinal Stenosis

Preliminary Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of the “No-Punch” Decompression Techniques for Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Clinical efficacy and imaging outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis

Comparison of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy with Other Surgical Technics: A Systemic Review of Indications and Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy from the Current Literature

Advantages of New Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) over Conventional Microscopic ULBD

Indications for and Outcomes of Three Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Approaches for the Decompression of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review

Efficacy of Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis With Single-Arm Analysis and Comparative Analysis With Microscopic Decompression and Uniportal Endoscopic Decompression

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression by 30° Arthroscopy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation linked with posterior ring apophysis separation: a retrospective study

Contralateral inclinatory approach for decompression of the lateral recess and same-level foraminal lesions using unilateral biportal endoscopy: A technical report

[Short-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy technique in treatment of lumbar lateral saphenous fossa combined with intervertebral foramina stenosis via contralateral sublaminar approach]

[Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and uniportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis]