SARS-CoV-2 Nirmatrelvir Resistance—A Concern for Immunocompromised Populations?

Zhuo Zhou,Peng Hong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35439

2024-09-26

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:Nirmatrelvir is the antiviral component of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, the first US Food and Drug Administration–approved oral antiviral for treatment of COVID-19 in adults. The widespread use of nirmatrelvir, in the absence of similarly effective alternatives, raises concerns about the emergence of nirmatrelvir-resistant variants. Scientists have identified a number of SARS-CoV-2 mutations that confer nirmatrelvir resistance in cell-based assays, 1 but they were rarely found in clinical specimens. 2 Elsewhere in JAMA Network Open , Tamura et al 3 give a timely assessment of nirmatrelvir-resistant variants in clinical settings. Using a highly sensitive next-generation sequencing approach, the researchers analyzed samples from a cohort of individuals with acute COVID-19 who were either treated with nirmatrelvir or left untreated. This study provides evidence that the risk of clinically significant resistance is currently low. While nirmatrelvir resistance mutations were detected more frequently in treated individuals, these mutations were mostly rare, appeared transiently, and did not appear to pose a substantial risk of virologic rebound. The findings are in line with other retrospective studies showing similar low frequency of nirmatrelvir-resistant variants, 2 suggesting that nirmatrelvir is still effective against most circulating variants. Although this study provides generally reassuring evidence, it does raise some concerns for immunocompromised populations. The researchers found that 23% immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 (5 of 22) harbored nirmatrelvir-resistant variants during or after nirmatrelvir treatment, compared with only 7% in immunocompetent patients (4 of 57). This finding, together with others, 4 pinpoints immunocompromised populations as a potential source of nirmatrelvir-resistant variants. Immunocompromised individuals appear to be at higher risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 mutations. A competent immune system usually clears SARS-CoV-2 infection within days after symptom onset, limiting opportunities for mutations to arise. However, prolonged or recurrent infections in immunocompromised individuals create a breeding ground for mutations, 4 resulting in increased viral genetic diversity, ie, a larger pool for drug selection. Nirmatrelvir, as other potent and selective antivirals, requires only a short treatment course of 5 days, 5 limiting the window of opportunity for a nirmatrelvir-resistant variant to become dominant. However, in immunocompromised individuals, nirmatrelvir treatment often extends beyond the standard 5 days due to their delayed viral clearance. 4 This prolonged treatment creates a longer window of selection pressure, potentially facilitating nirmatrelvir-resistant variants to gain dominance. This concern is underscored by the case reported by Tamura et al, 3 in which a nirmatrelvir-resistant variant in an immunocompromised patient treated with nirmatrelvir for 6 days reached 31% dominance just 2 days after an undetected test. Such rapid evolution of the viral population would warrant close monitoring of immunocompromised individuals receiving prolonged nirmatrelvir treatment. Nirmatrelvir is not authorized for prevention of COVID-19, 5 which helps limit the spread of nirmatrelvir-resistant variants. Under this guidance, a nirmatrelvir-resistant variant would no longer have selection advantage after spreading into a new host. Additionally, most nirmatrelvir-resistant mutations weaken viral fitness, making nirmatrelvir-resistant variants less competitive. 1 This was observed in the study by Tamura et al, 3 in which resistant variants were quickly outcompeted by nonresistant variants after cessation of nirmatrelvir treatment. However, influenza A viruses with oseltamivir resistance mutations (H274Y) demonstrate that additional permissive mutations can restore viral fitness, 6 and there is already a report 7 of SARS-CoV-2 variants acquiring both nirmatrelvir resistance and high fitness through a combination of mutations in cell culture. If there is epistasis (interactions between mutations) such that multiple mutations are required for both drug resistance and viral fitness, the prolonged infections in immunocompromised hosts would allow these mutations to accumulate sequentially. This could enable the virus to make evolutionary jumps toward dominant drug–resistant variants. These observations highlight the hidden risk of nirmatrelvir resistance and again stress the importance of proactive viral genomics surveillance in immunocompromised populations. Nirmatrelvir's recent arrival on the scene compared with other antivirals highlights a constant challenge: the inevitable emergence of drug resistance. This sets the stage for an ongoing arms race between drug development and pathogen -Abstract Truncated-

medicine, general & internal