Abstract:Bacteria like E . coli grow at vastly different rates on different substrates, however, the precise reason for this variability is poorly understood. Different growth rates have been attributed to 'nutrient quality', a key parameter in bacterial growth laws. However, it remains unclear to what extent nutrient quality is rooted in fundamental biochemical constraints like the energy content of nutrients, the protein cost required for their uptake and catabolism, or the capacity of the plasma membrane for nutrient transporters. Here, we show that while nutrient quality is indeed reflected in protein investment in substrate-specific transporters and enzymes, this is not a fundamental limitation on growth rate, at least for certain 'poor' substrates. We show that it is possible to turn mannose, one of the 'poorest' substrates of E . coli , into one of the 'best' substrates by reengineering chromosomal promoters of the mannose transporter and metabolic enzymes required for mannose degradation. This result falls in line with previous observations of more subtle growth rate improvement for many other carbon sources. However, we show that this faster growth rate comes at the cost of diverse cellular capabilities, reflected in longer lag phases, worse starvation survival and lower motility. We show that addition of cAMP to the medium can rescue these phenotypes but imposes a corresponding growth cost. Based on these data, we propose that nutrient quality is largely a self-determined, plastic property that can be modulated by the fraction of proteomic resources devoted to a specific substrate in the much larger proteome sector of catabolically activated genes. Rather than a fundamental biochemical limitation, nutrient quality reflects resource allocation decisions that are shaped by evolution in specific ecological niches and can be quickly adapted if necessary. Bacteria grow at very different rates on different substrates. Therefore, the substrates themselves are often denoted as 'rich' substrates versus 'poor' substrates. However, it remains unclear what makes a nutrient a 'rich' or a 'poor' substrate. A host of different explanations have been suggested, such as the energy content and chemical composition of the nutrient, the amount of protein required for efficient catabolism of the substrate, or limitations of 'space' in the plasma membrane for fitting transporters of the substrate. All of these hypotheses are actively debated today. Here, we show instead that at least for certain substrates, nutrient quality can be a plastic property that can be dialed by evolution. Different nutrients enable bacteria to grow, but they also serve as a major signal that allows microbes to infer information about their environment. We propose that nutrient quality encoded in a combination regulatory architecture and enzymatic properties, serves as both as a map of the safety and reliability of the environment and as a regulatory mechanism that implements proteome allocation decisions.

Coordinated Slowing of Metabolism in Enteric Bacteria under Nitrogen Limitation: A Perspective

GlnK Facilitates the Dynamic Regulation of Bacterial Nitrogen Assimilation

Deciphering the Principles of Bacterial Nitrogen Dietary Preferences: a Strategy for Nutrient Containment

L-Glutamine as a nitrogen source for Corynebacterium glutamicum: derepression of the AmtR regulon and implications for nitrogen sensing

Flux balance analysis of ammonia assimilation network in E. coli predicts preferred regulation point

Polyamine and Ethanolamine Metabolism in Bacteria as an Important Component of Nitrogen Assimilation for Survival and Pathogenicity

Kinetics and structural features of dimeric glutamine-dependent bacterial NAD+ synthetases suggest evolutionary adaptation to available metabolites

Transcriptome and Metabolome Reveal the Molecular Mechanism of Barley Genotypes Underlying the Response to Low Nitrogen and Resupply

Regulation of GlnK activity: modification, membrane sequestration and proteolysis as regulatory principles in the network of nitrogen control in Corynebacterium glutamicum

Transcriptomic analysis of nitrogen metabolism pathways in Klebsiella aerogenes under nitrogen-rich conditions

Feedback regulation and coordination of the main metabolism for bacterial growth and metabolic engineering for amino acid fermentation

Interacting Bioenergetic and Stoichiometric Controls on Microbial Growth

Distinct mechanisms coordinate transcription and translation under carbon and nitrogen starvation in Escherichia coli

Characterizing the metabolic trade-off in Nitrosomonas europaea in response to changes in inorganic carbon supply

Engineering glucose metabolism of Escherichia coli under nitrogen starvation

The Distinctive Regulation of Cyanobacterial Glutamine Synthetase

Sirtuin-Dependent Reversible Lysine Acetylation Of Glutamine Synthetases Reveals An Autofeedback Loop In Nitrogen Metabolism

Regulatory mechanisms underlying coordination of amino acid and glucose catabolism in Escherichia coli

The Influence of C:N Ratio in the Growth Medium on the Cellular Composition and Regulation of Enzyme Activity in Hyphomicrobium X

Plasticity of growth laws tunes resource allocation strategies in bacteria

Regulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid degradation in Escherichia coli by nitrogen metabolism enzymes