Abstract:Because of incomplete information on pre-sold products, consumers face uncertainty about the value of what they have purchased, which leads to a mismatch between supply and demand and a large number of returns. By developing appropriate return policies and effectively managing and handling consumer returns, retailers can not only reduce waste but also ensure better resource utilization, which is essential for sustainable development. In this paper, we analyze the full-refund and full-and-freight-refund policies of retailers and develop a game model based on binary competition for selecting the optimal return policy for the pre-sold products of two retailers. The study shows that when both retailers have low capacity, there is no pre-sale stage. However, when their combined capacity is high and exceeds the demand of non-strategic consumers, equilibrium depends on their combined capacity and the proportion of strategic consumers who choose to keep the pre-purchased product under both return policies. When the number of strategic consumers who retain pre-order products is low under the full-refund policy and both retailers have moderate capacity, equilibrium is achieved when an asymmetric return policy is followed rather than a symmetric return policy. Specifically, when the percentage of strategic consumers who keep their reserved products under the product return strategy is small and the capacity of the two retailers is moderate, the maximum benefit is achieved if one of the retailers adopts the policy of a full refund and the other adopts the policy of a full-and-freight refund. Otherwise, when one retailer adopts the policy of a full refund or a full-and-freight refund, its competitor should adopt the same strategy to gain maximum revenue. The research on retailers’ pre-sale and return strategies in this paper helps to optimize the operational strategies and operational processes of e-retailers, further improve the management and decision making of their joint pre-sale and return strategies, and help optimize retailers’ profits.

Retailing and ordering strategies for online apparel retailers facing bracketing purchase behaviour

Pricing and Assortment Decision of Competitive Omnichannel Selling Strategy: Considering Online Return Cost

Return Freight Insurance Strategy and Price Decisionsfor a Dual-channel Supply Chain in the Presence of Showrooming

Return freight strategies and selling formats in e-commerce supply chain: The perspective of consumer fairness concerns and online shopping returns

Does Retailer Benefit from Implementing “Online-to-store” Channel in a Competitive Market?

Return Freight Insurance Strategy and Price Decisions for a Dual-Channel Supply Chain in the Presence of Showrooming

Optimal Return Policy of Competitive Retailers’ Pre-Sale Products Based on Strategic Consumer Behavior

Optimal Shipping Strategy and Return Service Charge under No-Reason Return Policy in Online Retailing

Omnichannel retailing with different order fulfillment and return options

Managing customer returns strategy with the option of selling returned products

Pricing and Return Strategy Selection of Online Retailers Considering Consumer Purchasing Behavior

The Impact of Consumer Returns on the Multichannel Sales Strategies of Manufacturers

The impact of customer returns in a supply chain with a common retailer

Pricing and Return Strategy: Whether to Adopt a Cross-Channel Return Option?

Joint Product Framing (Display, Ranking, Pricing) and Order Fulfillment Under the Multinomial Logit Model for E-Commerce Retailers

Return Mode Selection and Pricing Strategy for a Dual-Channel Retailer

Pricing Strategy in Multi-Channel Apparel Supply Chain with Showrooming Effect

The effects of out-of-stock, return, and cancellation amounts on the order amounts of an online retailer

Return Strategies and Channel Pricing in Omni-Channel Retail Considering Heterogeneous Customer Perceptions

Managing Consumer Returns in a Competitive Environment

Pricing, Service Level and Lot Size Decisions of a Supply Chain with Risk-Averse Retailers: Implications to Practitioners