Indoor air microbiota of pig farms drives the composition of the pig farmer’s 1 nasal microbiota in a season dependent and farm specific manner

A. Oppliger,Susanne Aebi,Julia G. Kraemer,M. Hilty

Abstract:Prior studies have demonstrated an influence of the built environment on the human nasal 23 microbiota. However, very little is known about the influences of working on a pig farm on the 24 human nasal microbiota. We longitudinally collected samples from 30 pig farms (air, nasal swabs 25 from humans and pigs) in Switzerland from 2014-2015. As controls, nasal swabs from cow farmers 26 and individuals with no contact with farm animals were included. Analysis of the microbiota for all 27 samples (n=609) was performed based on 16S rRNA sequencing (MiSeq) and included the 28 investigations of source-sink dynamics. 29 The number of indoor airborne particles and bacterial load in pig farms was highest in winter. 30 Similarly, the microbiota analyses revealed that the alpha-diversity values of the nares of pig farmers 31 were increased in winter in contrast to samples from the non-exposed controls which displayed low 32 alpha-diversity values throughout the seasons. Source-sink analyses revealed that bacteria from the 33 nose of pigs are more commonly co-identified within the pig farmer’s microbiota in winter but to a 34 less extent in summer. In addition, in winter, there was a stronger intra-similarity for samples that 35 originated from the same farm as compared to samples from different farms and this farm-specificity 36 was partially or completely lost in spring, summer and fall. 37 In conclusion, in contrast to non-exposed controls, a pig farmer’s nasal microbiota is dynamic as the 38 indoor air microbiota of pig farms drives the composition of the pig farmer’s nasal microbiota in a 39 season dependent manner. tenfold copy numbers. A negative control 261 was included in every run. The following cycling conditions were used: 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 262 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. The results were collected using the QuantStudio 6 263 and 7 Flex Software. Each sample was measured in triplicate. Samples with high Ct values (>35) were 264 excluded from analysis (n=15/105; 15.75%). The 16S rRNA gene copy numbers were logarithmically 265 transformed for analysis and seasonal differences were determined using a linear model ( lmer ).

Environmental Science