Deep convolutional‐neural‐network‐based metal artifact reduction for CT‐guided interventional oncology procedures (MARIO)

Wenchao Cao,Ahmad Parvinian,Daniel Adamo,Brian Welch,Matthew Callstrom,Liqiang Ren,Andrew Missert,Christopher P. Favazza
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16980
IF: 4.506
2024-02-15
Medical Physics
Abstract:Background Computed tomography (CT) is routinely used to guide cryoablation procedures. Notably, CT‐guidance provides 3D localization of cryoprobes and can be used to delineate frozen tissue during ablation. However, metal‐induced artifacts from ablation probes can make accurate probe placement challenging and degrade the ice ball conspicuity, which in combination could lead to undertreatment of potentially curable lesions. Purpose In this work, we propose an image‐based neural network (CNN) model for metal artifact reduction for CT‐guided interventional procedures. Methods An image domain metal artifact simulation framework was developed and validated for deep‐learning‐based metal artifact reduction for interventional oncology (MARIO). CT scans were acquired for 19 different cryoablation probe configurations. The probe configurations varied in the number of probes and the relative orientations. A combination of intensity thresholding and masking based on maximum intensity projections (MIPs) was used to segment both the probes only and probes + artifact in each phantom image. Each of the probe and probe + artifact images were then inserted into 19 unique patient exams, in the image domain, to simulate metal artifact appearance for CT‐guided interventional oncology procedures. The resulting 361 pairs of simulated image volumes were partitioned into disjoint training and test datasets of 304 and 57 volumes, respectively. From the training partition, 116 600 image patches with a shape of 128 × 128 × 5 pixels were randomly extracted to be used for training data. The input images consisted of a superposition of the patient and probe + artifact images. The target images consisted of a superposition of the patient and probe only images. This dataset was used to optimize a U‐Net type model. The trained model was then applied to 50 independent, previously unseen CT images obtained during renal cryoablations. Three board‐certified radiologists with experience in CT‐guided ablations performed a blinded review of the MARIO images. A total of 100 images (50 original, 50 MARIO processed) were assessed across different aspects of image quality on a 4‐point likert‐type item. Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon signed‐rank test for paired samples. Results Reader scores were significantly higher for MARIO processed images compared to the original images across all metrics (all p
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?