Histopathology, mRNA expression profile, and donor‐derived cell‐free DNA for assessment of rejection in pediatric heart transplantation

Conor P. O'Halloran,Paul Tannous,Nicoleta C. Arva,Philip T. Thrush,Michael Monge,Anna Joong,Defne A. Magnetta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14705
2024-03-26
Pediatric Transplantation
Abstract:Histopathology and MMDx displayed moderate agreement in diagnosing AR after pediatric HT, with most discrepancies in the presence of ABMR. DdcfDNA has excellent discrimination and high NPV particularly when utilizing MMDx. Background The relationship between histopathologic and molecular ("MMDx"®) assessments of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and serum donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (ddcfDNA) in acute rejection (AR) assessment following pediatric heart transplantation (HT) is unknown. Methods EMB sent for MMDx and histopathology from November 2021 to September 2022 were reviewed. MMDx and histopathology results were compared. DdcfDNA obtained ≤1 week prior to EMB were compared with histopathology and MMDx results. The discrimination of ddcfDNA for AR was assessed using receiver‐operating curves. Findings In this study, 177 EMBs were obtained for histopathology and MMDx, 101 had time‐matched ddcfDNA values. MMDx and Histopathology displayed moderate agreement for T‐cell‐mediated rejection (TCMR, Kappa = 0.52, p
pediatrics,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?