Brief History of Fibers from Synthetic Polymers

Paul W. Morgan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222338108066456

1981-04-01

Abstract:The history of fully synthetic fibers covers only ∼50 years and yet today production of synthetic fibers is in billions of kilograms per year. The development of these fibers depended upon advances and discoveries in polymer synthesis, new spinning methods and, in some cases, new polymer solvents. The first such fibers were prepared by Carothers and co-workers (in particular Julian Hill) of the Du Pont Co. in the early 1930s in studies on condensation polymers. They first did key experiments with polyesters but then turned to the higher melting aliphatic polyamides for development. Nylon 66 was promotionally produced in 1938. Since then many synthetic polymers have been examined for fiber formation. Polyacrylonitrile fibers became commercial in 1950 after a search for spinning solvents by Houtz. In 1953 poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers were manufactured following research by Whinfield and Dickson. Discoveries by Ziegler, Natta, and others in the 1950s led to isotactic polypropylene and fibers therefrom. The nylons, polyesters, polyacrylics, and polyolefins comprise the present major classes of synthetic fibers. In addition there has been developed at lower volumes a variety of fibers of considerable and growing importance. Many represent innovations of polymer- and fiber-making technology and in uses. Examples are Spandex elastic fibers, heat- and flame-resistant fibers from polyfluorocarbons, polybenzimidazole and aramids, and high-strength, high-modulus fibers from graphite and aramids. The terms “man-made fibers” and “synthetic fibers” are usually interpreted to mean all fibers which are not natural. This then would include those made by forming or re-forming cellulose, proteins, and their derivatives. The intent here is to discuss primarily the fibers from wholly synthetic polymers. A few key dates on the origin of fibers from regenerated cellulose and cellulose derivatives are given. There is included for comparative purposes some discussion on glass and graphite even though they may be regarded as falling in different chemical and structural categories.