Abstract:Embryonic development is driven by spatial patterns of gene expression that determine the fate of each cell in the embryo. While gene expression is often highly erratic, embryonic development is usually exceedingly precise. In particular, gene expression boundaries are robust not only against intra-embryonic fluctuations such as noise in gene expression and protein diffusion, but also against embryo-to-embryo variations in the morphogen gradients, which provide positional information to the differentiating cells. How development is robust against intra- and inter-embryonic variations is not understood. A common motif in the gene regulation networks that control embryonic development is mutual repression between pairs of genes. To assess the role of mutual repression in the robust formation of gene expression patterns, we have performed large-scale stochastic simulations of a minimal model of two mutually repressing gap genes in Drosophila, hunchback (hb) and knirps (kni). Our model includes not only mutual repression between hb and kni, but also the stochastic and cooperative activation of hb by the anterior morphogen Bicoid (Bcd) and of kni by the posterior morphogen Caudal (Cad), as well as the diffusion of Hb and Kni between neighboring nuclei. Our analysis reveals that mutual repression can markedly increase the steepness and precision of the gap gene expression boundaries. In contrast to other mechanisms such as spatial averaging and cooperative gene activation, mutual repression thus allows for gene-expression boundaries that are both steep and precise. Moreover, mutual repression dramatically enhances their robustness against embryo-to-embryo variations in the morphogen levels. Finally, our simulations reveal that diffusion of the gap proteins plays a critical role not only in reducing the width of the gap gene expression boundaries via the mechanism of spatial averaging, but also in repairing patterning errors that could arise because of the bistability induced by mutual repression.

Role of gene–gene loops in fine-tuning cross-regulation

Chromatin loops facilitate co-regulation of paralogues

Global coupling of R-loop dynamics with RNA polymerase II modulates gene expression and early development of Drosophila

DNA looping in gene regulation: from the assembly of macromolecular complexes to the control of transcriptional noise

Transcriptional coupling of distant regulatory genes in living embryos

Chromatin Loops as Allosteric Modulators of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions

Relative Dehn functions of amalgamated products and HNN--extensions

Multifaceted roles of cohesin in regulating transcriptional loops

A PRE loop at the dac locus acts as a topological chromatin structure that restricts and specifies enhancer–promoter communication

Chromatin looping links gene expression to the assembly of transcription factories (Review)

Chromosome Structure II: Stem-loops and Circle-loops

Conserved H3K27me3-associated chromatin looping mediates physical interactions of gene clusters in plants

Sequence Dependence of Transcription Factor-Mediated DNA Looping

On the functional properties of microRNA-mediated feed forward loops

Cell-type-specific loops linked to RNA polymerase II elongation in human neural differentiation

PARALOGOUS HOX GENES: Function and Regulation

Independence of chromatin conformation and gene regulation during Drosophila dorsoventral patterning

Mutual Repression Enhances the Steepness and Precision of Gene Expression Boundaries

Transcriptionally active chromatin loops contain both 'active' and 'inactive' histone modifications that exhibit exclusivity at the level of nucleosome clusters

Developmental Effector Gene Regulation: Multiplexed Strategies for Functional Analysis

Chromosome structure in Drosophila is determined by boundary pairing not loop extrusion