Abstract:Divergence time estimation-the calibration of a phylogeny to geological time-is an integral first step in modeling the tempo of biological evolution (traits and lineages). However, despite increasingly sophisticated methods to infer divergence times from molecular genetic sequences, the estimated age of many nodes across the tree of life contrast significantly and consistently with timeframes conveyed by the fossil record. This is perhaps best exemplified by crown angiosperms, where molecular clock (Triassic) estimates predate the oldest (Early Cretaceous) undisputed angiosperm fossils by tens of millions of years or more. While the incompleteness of the fossil record is a common concern, issues of data limitation and model inadequacy are viable (if underexplored) alternative explanations. In this vein, Beaulieu et al. (2015) convincingly demonstrated how methods of divergence time inference can be misled by both (i) extreme state-dependent molecular substitution rate heterogeneity and (ii) biased sampling of representative major lineages. These results demonstrate the impact of (potentially common) model violations. Here, we suggest another potential challenge: that the configuration of the statistical inference problem (i.e., the parameters, their relationships, and associated priors) alone may preclude the reconstruction of the paleontological timeframe for the crown age of angiosperms. We demonstrate, through sampling from the joint prior (formed by combining the tree (diversification) prior with the calibration densities specified for fossil-calibrated nodes) that with no data present at all, that an Early Cretaceous crown angiosperms is rejected (i.e., has essentially zero probability). More worrisome, however, is that for the 24 nodes calibrated by fossils, almost all have indistinguishable marginal prior and posterior age distributions when employing routine lognormal fossil calibration priors. These results indicate that there is inadequate information in the data to over-rule the joint prior. Given that these calibrated nodes are strategically placed in disparate regions of the tree, they act to anchor the tree scaffold, and so the posterior inference for the tree as a whole is largely determined by the pseudodata present in the (often arbitrary) calibration densities. We recommend, as for any Bayesian analysis, that marginal prior and posterior distributions be carefully compared to determine whether signal is coming from the data or prior belief, especially for parameters of direct interest. This recommendation is not novel. However, given how rarely such checks are carried out in evolutionary biology, it bears repeating. Our results demonstrate the fundamental importance of prior/posterior comparisons in any Bayesian analysis, and we hope that they further encourage both researchers and journals to consistently adopt this crucial step as standard practice. Finally, we note that the results presented here do not refute the biological modeling concerns identified by Beaulieu et al. (2015). Both sets of issues remain apposite to the goals of accurate divergence time estimation, and only by considering them in tandem can we move forward more confidently.

Timing the eastern Asian–eastern North American floristic disjunction: molecular clock corroborates paleontological estimates

The age of the angiosperms: a molecular timescale without a clock

The eastern Asian and eastern and western North American floristic disjunction: congruent phylogenetic patterns in seven diverse genera

Testing Relative Evolutionary Rates and Estimating Divergence Times among Six Genera of Rhizophoraceae Using Cpdna and Nrdna Sequences

Differential Diversifications of South American and Eastern Asian Disjunct Genera Bocconia and Macleaya (Papaveraceae)

Ad fontes: divergence‐time estimation and the age of angiosperms

Evolution of Eastern Asian and Eastern North American Disjunct Distributions in Flowering Plants

Morphological and molecular comparisons ofCampsis grandiflora andC. radicans (Bignoniaceae), an eastern Asian and eastern North American vicariad species pair

Dating dispersal and radiation in the gymnosperm Gnetum (Gnetales)--clock calibration when outgroup relationships are uncertain

Phylogenetic relationships among the genera of Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae: evidence from rbcL sequences

Resolving an Ancient, Rapid Radiation in Saxifragales

Divergence times and historical biogeography of Nymphaeales

A transcriptome-based resolution for a key taxonomic controversy in Cupressaceae

The age and diversification of the angiosperms re‐revisited

The Perfect Storm: Gene Tree Estimation Error, Incomplete Lineage Sorting, and Ancient Gene Flow Explain the Most Recalcitrant Ancient Angiosperm Clade, Malpighiales.

Genetic insights into the evolution of genera with the eastern Asia-eastern North America floristic disjunction: a transcriptomics analysis

The Past Sure is Tense: On Interpreting Phylogenetic Divergence Time Estimates

Phylogenetic diversity of eastern Asia–eastern North America disjunct plants is mainly associated with divergence time

A Genomewide Scan for Genetic Structure and Demographic History of Two Closely Related Species, Rhododendron dauricum and R. mucronulatum (Rhododendron, Ericaceae)

Wind-dispersed seeds blur phylogeographic breaks: The complex evolutionary history of Populus lasiocarpa around the Sichuan Basin