Abstract:Radial motion is perceived as faster than linear motion when local spatiotemporal properties are matched. This radial speed bias (RSB) is thought to occur because radial motion is partly interpreted as motion-in-depth. Geometry dictates that a fixed amount of radial expansion at increasing eccentricities is consistent with smaller motion in depth, so it is perhaps surprising that the impact of eccentricity on RSB has not been examined. With this issue in mind, across 3 experiments we investigated the RSB as a function of eccentricity. In a 2IFC task, participants judged which of a linear (test - variable speed) or radial (reference - 2 or 4°/s) stimulus appeared to move faster. Linear and radial stimuli comprised 4 Gabor patches arranged left, right, above and below fixation at varying eccentricities (3.5°-14°). For linear stimuli, Gabors all drifted left or right, whereas for radial stimuli Gabors drifted towards or away from the centre. The RSB (difference in perceived speeds between matched linear and radial stimuli) was recovered from fitted psychometric functions. Across all 3 experiments we found that the RSB decreased with eccentricity but this tendency was less marked beyond 7° - i.e. at odds with the geometry, the effect did not continue to decrease as a function of eccentricity. This was true irrespective of whether stimuli were fixed in size (Experiment 1) or varied in size to account for changes in spatial scale across the retina (Experiment 2). It was also true when we removed conflicting stereo cues via monocular viewing (Experiment 3). To further investigate our data, we extended a previous model of speed perception, which suggests perceived motion for such stimuli reflects a balance between two opposing perceptual interpretations, one for motion in depth and the other for object deformation. We propose, in the context of this model, that our data are consistent with placing greater weight on the motion in depth interpretation with increasing eccentricity and this is why the RSB does not continue to reduce in line with purely geometric constraints.

Visual–spatial abilities are NOT related to the speed of mental rotation.

Individual differences in processing ability to transform visual stimuli during the mental rotation task are closely related to individual motor adaptation ability

Visual Working Memory Load Does Not Affect the Overall Stimulus Processing Time in Visual Search.

Visuo-spatial working memory abilities modulate mental rotation: Evidence from event-related potentials

A note on sex differences in mental rotation in different age groups

The effect of eccentricity on the linear-radial speed bias: Testing the motion-in-depth model

How robust is the relationship between neural processing speed and cognitive abilities?

The impact of presentation modes on mental rotation processing: a comparative analysis of eye movements and performance

Effects of Stimulus Views on Mental Rotation of Hands: an Event-Related Potential Study

Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation: A replication

Time limits in testing: An analysis of eye movements and visual attention in spatial problem solving

Mental rotation and language in autism spectrum disorder

Gender effects on mental rotation in pilots vs. nonpilots

Spatial organisation in the human mind as a function of the distance between stimuli

Eye movements during mental rotation of nonmirrored and mirrored three-dimensional abstract objects

Decision-Making Time Analysis for Assessing Processing Speed in Athletes during Motor Reaction Tasks

Object speed perception during lateral visual self-motion

Vertical Mental Timeline Is Not Influenced by VisuoSpatial Processing

The Psychophysics of Human Three-Dimensional Active Visuospatial Problem-Solving

Toward a better approach for measuring visual-search slopes.

Response time and response time variability as indicators of response quality during static automated perimetry