Digital Gonioscopy Based on Three-dimensional Anterior-Segment OCT
Fei Li,Yifan Yang,Xu Sun,Zhen Qiu,Shihao Zhang,Tin Aung Tun,Baskaran Mani,Monisha Esther Nongpiur,Sunee Chansangpetch,Kitiya Ratanawongphaibul,Anita Manassakorn,Visanee Tantisevi,Prin Rojanapongpun,Fengbin Lin,Weijing Cheng,Rouxi Zhou,Yuhong Liu,Yu Chen,Jian Xiong,Mingkui Tan,Tin Aung,Yanwu Xu,Daniel S W Ting,Xiulan Zhang,Daniel S.W. Ting
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.018
IF: 14.277
2022-01-01
Ophthalmology
Abstract:PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate the performance of a 3-dimensional (3D) deep-learning-based automated digital gonioscopy system (DGS) in detecting 2 major characteristics in eyes with suspected primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG): (1) narrow iridocorneal angles (static gonioscopy, Task I) and (2) peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) (dynamic gonioscopy, Task II) on OCT scans.DESIGN: International, cross-sectional, multicenter study.PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1.112 million images of 8694 volume scans (2294 patients) from 3 centers were included in this study (Task I, training/internal validation/external testing: 4515, 1101, and 2222 volume scans, respectively; Task II, training/internal validation/external testing: 378, 376, and 102 volume scans, respectively).METHODS: For Task I, a narrow angle was defined as an eye in which the posterior pigmented trabecular meshwork was not visible in more than 180° without indentation in the primary position captured in the dark room from the scans. For Task II, PAS was defined as the adhesion of the iris to the trabecular meshwork. The diagnostic performance of the 3D DGS was evaluated in both tasks with gonioscopic records as reference.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the 3D DGS were calculated.RESULTS: In Task I, 29.4% of patients had a narrow angle. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 3D DGS on the external testing datasets were 0.943 (0.933-0.953), 0.867 (0.838-0.895), and 0.878 (0.859-0.896), respectively. For Task II, 13.8% of patients had PAS. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 3D DGS were 0.902 (0.818-0.985), 0.900 (0.714-1.000), and 0.890 (0.841-0.938), respectively, on the external testing set at quadrant level following normal clinical practice; and 0.885 (0.836-0.933), 0.912 (0.816-1.000), and 0.700 (0.660-0.741), respectively, on the external testing set at clock-hour level.CONCLUSIONS: The 3D DGS is effective in detecting eyes with suspected PACG. It has the potential to be used widely in the primary eye care community for screening of subjects at high risk of developing PACG.
ophthalmology