Two trinuclear cluster metal–organic frameworks: syntheses, structures, highly fluorescent sensing and magnetic properties

Jiewei Rong,Xiaoling Wang,Guilin Wen,Daofu Liu,Wenwei Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2024.121993
IF: 3.118
2024-02-26
Inorganica Chimica Acta
Abstract:Two new metal–organic frameworks [Zn 3 (TCPB) 2 (H 2 O) 2 ]·3DMF·2H 2 O ( 1 ) and [Mn 1.5 (TCPB)(DMF)(H 2 O)]·DMF( 2 )(H 3 TCPB = 1,3,5-tri(4-carboxyphenoxy)benzene), have been successfully constructed by solvothermal methods and structurally characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction, elemental analyses, IR spectra, Raman spectra, 1 H NMR spectra, powder X-ray diffraction and thermogravimetric analyses. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses reveal that complex 1 crystallizes in the trigonal space group P 3 ̄ 1 c and possesses a 2D network, whereas complex 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 ̄ and also possesses a 2D network. TOPOS analyses reveal that both complexes 1 and 2 have a (3,6)-connected network topology with the Schläfli symbol of (4 3 ·6 12 ) (4 3 ) 2 for 1 and {4 3 } 2 {4 6 ·6 6 ·8 3 } for 2 . Notably, further investigation indicates that complex 1 can be employed as a bi-functional fluorescent sensor for highly sensitive and selective detection of ferric ions (Fe 3+ ) and 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (TNP), with the detection limit of 0.11 μM for Fe 3+ and 0.14 μM for TNP. Furthermore, the possible fluorescence quenching mechanisms are explained as: (a) photo-induced electron transfer (PET) caused by the HOMO-LUMO energy gap through DFT and (b) fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Besides, the magnetic property measurement indicated that complex 2 shows antiferromagnetic interactions between trinuclear {Mn 3 (COO) 6 } SBUs.
chemistry, inorganic & nuclear
What problem does this paper attempt to address?