Association of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Overall Survival Among Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Jian-Xian Lin,Yi-Hui Tang,Guan-Jie Lin,Yu-Bin Ma,Jacopo Desiderio,Ping Li,Jian-Wei Xie,Jia-Bin Wang,Jun Lu,Qi-Yue Chen,Long-Long Cao,Mi Lin,Ru-Hong Tu,Chao-Hui Zheng,Amilcare Parisi,Mark J. Truty,Chang-Ming Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5557
2022-04-01
JAMA Network Open
Abstract:ImportanceNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment option for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC); however, the indications for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with LAGC who received NAC remain controversial.ObjectiveTo compare survival rates between patients with LAGC who received AC and those who did not after NAC followed by surgery.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis multicenter, international cohort study included 353 patients with LAGC undergoing curative-intent gastrectomy after NAC at 2 tertiary referral teaching hospitals in China between June 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017. To externally validate the findings in the Chinese patients, 109 patients from the US and Italy between June 1, 2006, and June 30, 2013, were reviewed. The follow-up period of the Chinese patients was completed in December 2020, and the follow-up period of the Western patients was completed between February and July 2017. Data analysis was performed from December 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021.ExposuresPatients who received AC and those who did not were propensity score matched to evaluate the association of AC with survival.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOverall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and disease-specific survival.ResultsOf 353 patients from China (275 [78.1%] male; mean [SD] age, 58.0 [10.7] years), 262 (74.1%) received AC and 91 (25.9%) did not. After propensity score matching, the 3-year OS was significantly higher in patients who received AC (60.1%; 95% CI, 53.1%-68.1%) than in those who did not (49.3%; 95% CI, 39.8%-61.0%) (P = .02). Lymph node ratio (LNR) was significantly associated with AC benefit (P < .001 for interaction), and a plot of the interaction between LNR and AC demonstrated that AC was associated with improved OS in patients with higher (≥9%) LNRs (3-year OS: 46.6% vs 21.7%;P < .001), but not in patients with LNRs less than 9% (3-year OS: 73.9% vs 71.3%;P = .30). When stratified by AC cycles, only those patients who completed at least 4 AC cycles exhibited a significant survival benefit in the 6-month (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.96;P = .03) and 9-month landmark analysis (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.94;P = .03). In the external cohort, improved OS with AC administration was also found in patients with LNRs of 9% or greater (3-year OS: 53.0% vs 26.3%;P = .04).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, the administration of AC after NAC and resection of LAGC was associated with improved prognosis in patients with LNRs of 9% or greater. These findings suggest that LNR might be valuable in AC selection in future decision-making processes.
medicine, general & internal