Safety and Effectiveness of Acute Intermittent Hypoxia during a Single Treatment at Different Hypoxic Severities

Cory M. Smith,Owen F. Salmon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2024.104358
IF: 2.821
2024-10-02
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology
Abstract:Purpose Examine the cardiovascular, muscular function, cognitive, and neural plastic responses to determine the safety and effectiveness of acute Intermittent hypoxia (AIH) at a low, high, and control fractional inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) dosage Methods Thirteen human participants performed 30-min of AIH in 60-s intervals at FiO2's of 0.21 (AIH 21 ), 0.15 (AIH 15 ), and 0.09 (AIH 9 ). Heart rate variability (root mean squared of successive differences; RMSSD), heart rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), blood pressure, muscular strength, neuromuscular activation, cerebral hemodynamic responses, cognition, symptomology, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) responses were measured before (Pre-AIH), after (post-AIH), and at 20-min of recovery (Recovery-AIH) Results There were no differences between AIH protocols for heart rate, RMSSD, blood pressure, or SpO2. Muscular strength improved Post-AIH for AIH 15 (10 %) and AIH 9 (14 %) and remained elevated (6 %) at Recovery-AIH. Neuromuscular activation increased Pre-AIH to Post-AIH for AIH15 (10 %) and AIH 9 (11 %). Cerebral hemodynamic responses were not impacted between conditions. Both AIH 15 and AIH9 increased BDNF Post-AIH (62 %) and Recovery-AIH (63 %) Conclusion Acute intermittent hypoxia is generally safe and effective at producing neural plastic responses, but further examination of co-occurring cardiovascular diseases is needed. This study provides safety focused findings which will widen the adoption and refinement of AIH protocols
physiology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?