The veterinarian's role in antimicrobial stewardship.
J. Fairles
2013-03-01
Abstract:Winter in southwestern Ontario can be a challenging time for veterinary practitioners. Looking at the outdoor temperature on my way home from a recent executive meeting reinforced that, as the outside temperature gauge in the car read an amazingly warm +15.5°C — no doubt a record. In my experience in food animal practice, fluctuating temperatures usually lead to respiratory disease outbreaks and the need for treatment with antimicrobials. For veterinarians, antimicrobial treatment decisions are an essential and integral part of practice. Recently there has been considerable interest, debate and discussion about antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial stewardship and the role that veterinarians are playing in this complex area.
Using an internet search for “antimicrobial resistance in animals” brings up a multitude of articles from local, national and world organizations. Many of these highlight the use of antimicrobials in animals and a supposition (perceived or not) that use in animals is contributing to antimicrobial resistance. In many parts of the world, rules on the use of antimicrobials vary considerably from less restrictive to more restrictive than the landscape for antimicrobial use here in Canada. From a veterinary perspective it seems logical that the veterinarian having the VCPR (Vet Client Patient Relationship) is in the best position to provide advice when it comes to prescribing the appropriate antimicrobial. With this comes the inherent responsibility that the veterinarian uses these antimicrobials in a prudent or judicious manner. Considering the veterinarian’s education and background knowledge in companion animal and food animal medicine, it is logical that the veterinarian is looked on as the “go to” professional to oversee and monitor antimicrobial use.
The first question one could ask is what is really meant by a prudent or judicious manner? Without going to the dictionary, this indicates to me that we are using these antibiotics after first determining if there may be other avenues to follow on the management and prevention side and then using the appropriate class of antibiotics, dose and duration wherever possible supported by diagnostics. Guidelines for prudent use have been developed by the CVMA and can be found in the “CVMA Prudent Use Guidelines 2008 for beef cattle, dairy cattle, poultry, and swine” (1) and the “CVMA Companion animal prudent use guidelines” (in development).
There is another aspect to prudent use that we must look at, and that is the type of antimicrobial that is used. For many reasons, it is always best to use a Health Canada veterinary approved drug. Only in unique and exceptional circumstances should we be continuing down the CVMA Compounding Guidelines decision cascade (2).
Approved veterinary drug (DIN): label instructions
Approved veterinary drug (DIN): extra-label drug use (ELDU)
Approved human drug (DIN): ELDU
Compounded product: from approved veterinary drug (DIN): ELDU
Compounded product: from approved human drug (DIN): ELDU
Compounded product: from active pharmaceutical ingredient (API): ELDU
It becomes especially difficult to manage antimicrobial use prudently moving down this cascade as we lose the ability to judge both efficacy, and in the case of food safety, withdrawal time. Resources such as CgFARAD (Canadian global food animal residue avoidance databank) do help but not in all circumstances. In a perfect world we should always weigh the antimicrobial use decision without weighing economic and convenience factors. Practically it becomes much more complex.
More and more, veterinarians are being asked to validate the antimicrobial prudent use process in clinic settings and on farms by participating in the delivery of quality assurance systems, the development of prudent use Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), and the monitoring of antimicrobial use. Is it then logical that the veterinarian with the VCPR is charged with managing the oversight of antimicrobial use? On first thought, this would seem to be an obvious yes. In companion animal medicine, through the prescription and dispensing process, management of use can be monitored (of course depending on compliance). In livestock production this is not quite so simple. There are many other avenues through which antimicrobials can arrive on a farm without a script and/or being dispensed by the veterinarian. Besides the non-prescription medicated ingredient additions to feed and the OTC (over the counter) market of Schedule F2 drugs, there are other avenues. One of these is via the unintended OUI (own use importation) loophole in Health Canada regulations (3,4). Another more concerning one is via the use of API’s (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients) (3,4). Quality assurance programs have helped as SOPs can be set up to manage the use of pharmaceuticals. The issue still remains however as to how the veterinarian can have complete oversight of all antimicrobials used in animals when they are not involved in the total decision-making process for antimicrobial use.
There are several recent and long standing initiatives to shore up regulations and close loopholes. This has been a very slow process. The CVMA has developed a position statement on OUI (5) and is in the process of developing an API use position statement. When these important topics are discussed the “elephant in the room” is always that the veterinarian can both prescribe and dispense antimicrobials and the inherent perceived conflict of interest. Regulators and the veterinary community in the European Union are in active discussions about the separation of these activities (6–8). There is considerable debate both for and against (9). Veterinary regulatory bodies in Canada are beginning to add antimicrobial resistance and stewardship training to their list of requirements for veterinary CE (10).
Today in Canada we have the privilege of both prescribing and dispensing. There are many good reasons to continue this. Antimicrobial stewardship is a process that all veterinarians should embrace. The CVMA will continue to lobby for the veterinarian to be the central professional in antimicrobial stewardship for antimicrobial use in animals. I would welcome any comments and discussion on this very important topic.