Efficacy and safety of non‐pharmacological interventions for labour pain management: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta‐analysis

Yinchu Hu,Hong Lu,Jing Huang,Yu Zang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15865
2021-06-01
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Aims and objectives</h3><p>To compare and rank the efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of labour pain.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Recently, various non-pharmacological interventions have been applied to manage labour pain and have shown positive effects. However, evidence identifying which type of non-pharmacological intervention is more efficient and safer is limited.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Design</h3><p>Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on PRISMA-NMA.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Seven databases were searched from database inception–March 2020. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, quality appraisal and data extraction. Conventional meta-analysis was conducted using either fixed-effects model or random-effects model according to statistical heterogeneity. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using the consistency model.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>43 studies involving nine non-pharmacological interventions were included. The Bayesian network meta-analysis showed that acupressure (SMD = −2.00, 95% CrI −3.09 to −0.94), aromatherapy (SMD = −2.01, 95% CrI −3.70 to −0.35) and massage therapy (SMD = −1.26, 95% CrI −2.26 to −0.30) had significant positive effects on alleviating labour pain, with aromatherapy being the most effective. The results also revealed that yoga (SMD = −130.85, 95% CrI −212.01 to −59.32) and acupressure (SMD = −10.14, 95% CrI −20.24 to −0.41) were the most effective interventions for shortening the first stage and the second stage of labour, respectively. There were no significant differences between non-pharmacological interventions and usual care or placebo control on the use of pharmacological methods and neonatal 5-min Apgar score.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>The evidence in this network meta-analysis illustrates that non-pharmacological interventions are effective and safe for labour pain management in low-risk pregnant women. In the future, well-designed studies are needed to validate the conclusion of this network meta-analysis.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Relevance to clinical practice</h3><p>The results support the use of non-pharmacological interventions, especially aromatherapy and acupressure, to relieve labour pain in low-risk pregnant women. Non-pharmacological interventions for labour pain management are recommended to apply according to maternal women's preference and values.</p></section>
nursing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?