The Impact of Facial Attractiveness on Economic Decision-Making
Junchen Shang,Yizhuo Zhang,Wenfeng Chen,Xiaolan Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/tb-2023-0795
2024-01-01
Abstract:Currently, the "eyeball economy" is developing rapidly. Facial attractiveness plays an important role in social transactions and the labor market. Biases in favor of attractive faces have been documented in research on attention, memory and other cognitive processes. Many researchers have investigated the influence of facial attractiveness on economic decision-making in recent years. Previous studies have shown that people make different decisions about attractive partners than about unattractive partners. However, the effect of facial attractiveness has been inconsistent across different studies. A large number of studies have confirmed the beauty premium effect such that people show preferences for attractive faces, while other research has revealed the beauty penalty or ugliness premium effect. Three different explanations have been proposed for the effect of facial attractiveness on decision-making, including explanations by economists, explanations by social psychologists, and evolutionary explanations. Economists developed a taste-based discrimination model and a statistical discrimination model. The former assumes that people prefer attractive faces regardless of their personality traits or behavioral performance, while the latter suggests that good-looking people usually perform better at their work and have a greater ability to negotiate higher wages with their employers. Like what the statistical discrimination model proposes, social psychologists suggest that attractive individuals often have more positive traits, that is, the "beauty is good" stereotype. For example, good-looking individuals are perceived as friendlier, more generous, more trustworthy, more competent, etc. However, explanations by economists and social psychologists are descriptive and indirect. Both of these explanations ignore the impact of sex on the bias toward facial attractiveness. Evolutionary explanations propose a more direct and comprehensive perspective that the bias of facial attractiveness in economic decision-making occurs because of the genetic and mating value of attractiveness. A beautiful appearance is usually a sign of good genes, which represents high mate value. The theory also offers possible explanations for the different decisions made toward same-sex versus opposite-sex attractive individuals (i.e., intrasexual competition versus intersexual selection). Although the explanations from different disciplines reflect a difference between levels of analyses and mechanisms, they do not completely conflict with each other. These factors are compatible with each other in explaining the bias of facial attractiveness when predicting the phenomenon of beauty premiums without considering sex. However, the evolutionary explanation provides a more comprehensive hypothesis for the greater effect of opposite-sex facial attractiveness on decision-making than that of same-sex faces. Nonetheless, the influence of facial attractiveness on economic decision-making is complex and multifaceted; therefore, it can be fully understood only by considering and integrating multiple perspectives, which are difficult to explain through the use of a single theoretical system. Electrophysiological studies have further revealed the neurobiological mechanisms involved in the cognitive processing of facial attractiveness and the perception of fairness and risk during decision-making and revealed that attractive faces induce a greater late positive component and activate brain regions related to reward processing, such as the nucleus accumbens, orbital frontal cortex, and ventral striatum. Although cognitive neuroscience studies have demonstrated the neurobiological mechanisms by which facial attractiveness affects economic decision-making, they do not provide strong evidence for the above three theoretical explanations because psychological factors such as preferences, stereotypes, and mating motives were not measured. Future research should investigate the interaction of multimodal attractiveness information such as voice and smell information in real economic decision-making situations, integrate electrophysiological studies with the existing theoretical system to comprehensively understand the underlying neural mechanism, and establish a comprehensive and systematic theoretical model to provide a theoretical basis for controlling appearance bias in the labor market and other social transactions.