Abstract:Accelerating urbanisation and associated lifestyle changes result in loss of biodiversity and diminished wellbeing of people through fewer direct interactions and experiences with nature. In this review, we propose the notion of urban wilding (the promotion of autonomous ecological processes that are independent of historical land‐use conditions, with minimal direct human maintenance and planting interventions) and investigate its propensity to improve biodiversity and people–nature connections in cities. Through a large interdisciplinary synthesis, we explore the ecological mechanisms through which urban wilding can promote biodiversity in cities, investigate the attitudes and relations of city dwellers towards urban wild spaces, and discuss the integration of urban wilding into the fabric of cities and its governance. We show that favouring assembly spontaneity by reducing planting interventions, and functional spontaneity by limiting maintenance practices, can promote plant diversity and provide ecological resources for numerous organisms at habitat and city scales. These processes could reverse biotic homogenisation, but further studies are needed to understand the effects of wilding on invasive species and their consequences. From a socio‐ecological perspective, the attitudes of city dwellers towards spontaneous vegetation are modulated by successional stages, with grassland and woodland stages preferred, but dense shrubby vegetation stages disliked. Wild spaces can diversify physical interactions with nature, and enrich multi‐sensory, affective and cognitive experiences of nature in cities. However, some aspects of wild spaces can cause anxiety, feeling unsafe, and the perception of abandonment. These negative attitudes could be mitigated by subtle design and maintenance interventions. While nature has long been thought of as ornamental and instrumental in cities, urban wilding could help to develop relational and intrinsic values of nature in the fabric of cities. Wildness and its singular aesthetics should be combined with cultural norms, resident uses and urban functions to plan and design urban spatial configurations promoting human–non‐human cohabitation. For urban wilding to be socially just and adapted to the needs of residents, its implementation should be backed by inclusive governance opening up discussion forums to residents and urban workers. Scientists can support these changes by collaborating with urban actors to design and experiment with new wild spaces promoting biodiversity and wellbeing of people in cities.

Biodiversity offsetting as a form of depoliticised nature: Social aspects of a pilot project in Lahti, Finland

Integrating a landscape connectivity approach into mitigation hierarchy planning by anticipating urban dynamics

Big Cities, Big Impacts? A spatial analysis of 3,335 ecological offsets in France since 2012

Biodiversity within the city: Effects of land sharing and land sparing urban development on avian diversity

Biodiversity Offset Program Design and Implementation

Three ways to deliver a net positive impact with biodiversity offsets

Multi-city analysis of synergies and trade-offs between urban bird diversity and carbon storage to inform decision-making

Beyond Biodiversity: Eliciting Diverse Values of Urban Green Spaces in Flanders

Wilding cities for biodiversity and people: a transdisciplinary framework

Land use synergies and conflicts identification in the framework of compatibility analyses and spatial assessment of ecological, socio-cultural and economic values

Contested representations of benefits of urban nature in a densifying marginalised neighbourhood

The ecological outcomes of biodiversity offsets under “no net loss” policies: A global review

Interrelationships and Trade-Offs between Urban Natural Space Use and Biodiversity

Perceptions of stakeholders on nature-based solutions in urban planning: A thematic analysis in six European cities

Forest clearances, compensatory afforestation and biodiversity offsetting in forests: Balancing flexibility and equivalency in Switzerland

Biodiversity is not a luxury: Unpacking wealth and power to accommodate the complexity of urban biodiversity

How do urban green space designs shape avian communities? Testing the area–heterogeneity trade-off

Connecting people with place-specific nature in cities reduces unintentional harm

Patch, matrix and disturbance variables negatively influence bird community structure in small-sized managed green spaces located in urban core areas

On Public Influence on People's Interactions with Ordinary Biodiversity

Effects of urban wetland patch pattern on the biodiversity of aquatic birds in Nairobi, Kenya