Abstract:OBJECTIVE Sociodemographic disparities in health outcomes are well documented, but the effects of such disparities on preoperative presentation of pituitary adenomas (PA) and surgical outcomes following resection are not completely understood. In this study the authors sought to compare the preoperative clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing PA resection at a private hospital (PH) versus a safety-net hospital (SNH). METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review over a 36-month period of patients with PAs who underwent endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery performed by the same attending neurosurgeon at either a PH or an SNH at a single academic medical institution. RESULTS A total of 92 PH patients and 69 SNH patients were included. SNH patients were more likely to be uninsured or have Medicaid (88.4% vs 10.9%, p < 0.0001). A larger percentage of SNH patients were Hispanic (98.7% vs 32.6% p < 0.0001), while PH patients were more likely to be non-Hispanic white (39.1% vs 4.3%, p < 0.0001). SNH patients had a larger mean PA diameter (26.2 vs 22.4 mm, p = 0.0347) and a higher rate of bilateral cavernous sinus invasion (13% vs 4.3%, p = 0.0451). SNH patients were more likely to present with headache (68.1% vs 45.7%, p = 0.0048), vision loss (63.8% vs 35.9%, p < 0.0005), panhypopituitarism (18.8% vs 4.3%, p = 0.0031), and pituitary apoplexy (18.8% vs 7.6%, p = 0.0334). Compared to PH patients, SNH patients were as likely to undergo gross-total resection (73.9% vs 76.1%, p = 0.7499) and had similar rates of postoperative improvement in headache (80% vs 89%, p = 0.14) and vision (82% vs 84%, p = 0.74), but had higher rates of postoperative panhypopituitarism (23% vs 10%, p = 0.04) driven by preoperative endocrinopathies. Although there were no differences in tumor recurrence or progression, loss to follow-up was seen in 7.6% of PH versus 18.6% (p = 0.04) of SNH patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients presenting to the SNH were more often uninsured or on Medicaid and presented with larger, more advanced pituitary tumors. SNH patients were more likely to present with headaches, vision loss, and apoplexy, likely translating to greater improvements in headache and vision observed after surgery. These findings highlight the association between medically underserved populations and more advanced disease states at presentation, and underscore the likely role of academic tertiary multidisciplinary care teams and endoscopic PA resection in somewhat mitigating sociodemographic factors known to portend poorer outcomes, though longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm these findings.

Sinonasal Complications of Combined Transseptal–Transnasal and Bilateral Transnasal Approaches for Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery

Improvement in the Quality of Early Postoperative Course after Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: Description of Surgical Technique and Outcome

A Modified Microscopic-Endoscopic Bilateral Transseptal Approach for Pituitary Adenomas: Comparisons of Nasal Outcome and Quality of Life Using the Microscopic Transnasal Approach

Modified Nasal Septum Root Mucoperiosteum Incision of Pituitary Adenomas Via Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach

Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Treating Pituitary Adenoma Via a Sub-Septum Mucosa Approach.

Sella turcica anatomy by three-dimensional computed tomography for an endonasal transsphenoidal approach to pituitary adenoma.

The Transsphenodial Microsurgery with Unilateral Incision of Endonasal Mucosa for Pituitary Adenomas

Analyses and Treatments of Postoperative Nasal Complications after Endonasal Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Neoplasms

Clinical analysis and treatment of nasal complications after transsphenoidal pituitary adenomasectomy

Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach Pituitary Adenomas Resection with Minimal Nasal Injury

Endoscopic Transnasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma

Concomitant Transsphenoidal Approach to the Anterior Skull Base and Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Endoscopic-assisted Transsphenoidal Approach for the Resection of Pituitary Adenoma

Risk Factors for Isolated Sphenoid Sinusitis after Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery

Postoperative Complications of Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenoma Resection

Anatomical-Radiological Aspects and Their Influence on the Results of Pituitary Adenomas Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery

Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Adenomas Surgery: the Surgical Experience of 178 Consecutive Patients and Learning Curve of Two Neurosurgeons

Comparative preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes at a private versus a safety-net hospital following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas

Extended Transsphenoidal Approach for Pituitary Adenomas Invading the Anterior Cranial Base, Cavernous Sinus, and Clivus: a Single-Center Experience with 126 Consecutive Cases

Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Assess the Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Tumor

Anatomical Differences in Sphenoid Sinus During Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery: Comparison Between Nonfunctioning Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor (PiTNET) and Growth Hormone-Secreting PiTNET